.
Terms like "salvation" "conversion" "justification" "sanctification" "glorification" etc. CAN be used variously - in the Bible, in Tradition and in theological treatises. That's why it is good to note HOW you mean it.
Protestants tend to be careful on this point, but when speaking with non-Protestants, there is an opportunity for misunderstanding (thus Protestants tend to be ESPECIALLY careful when speaking to them). Protestants are APT to use the words "salvation" and "justification" and (less often) "conversion" to refer to the change in status, the divine granting of Life and Faith, the application of the works of Christ, the coming into the covenant of mercy. They are APT to use terms like "sanctification" and "discipleship" and "Christian life" to refer to ALL that follows and results from that, what the LIVING of this Gift of Life is to be. For Protestants, it is important that we affirm what we call "The Chief Article of Faith" or "Chief Doctrine" - that Jesus is the Savior. JESUS - no other, including the one we see in the mirror. IS (actually, fully, effectively) THE (exclusively, solely and all-sufficiently) SAVIOR (not helper, not offerer, not possibility-maker, not Gate Opener). AND to protect and affirm the need for our life to reflect Christ's life - not so that we may gain life but because we have this life, loving because we are FIRST loved, giving from what we FIRST were given. Protestants think these things are very important.
In much of popular Catholicism, it's all VERY messy, all this is mixed up and blended and entangled. It's GOOD and RIGHT that Catholics see these things as inseparable but wrong that they see these things as identical. It's GOOD and RIGHT to see them both as associated with each other, wrong that they hold that the our living enabling our coming to life rather than our life enabling our living. To use an example: It's TRUE that the living are to breathe (and do so), it's wrong to insist that it is our breathing that causes our conception. Association does not mandate causation. Popular Catholicism is RIGHT to hold these together but wrong to confuse and blend and mix them up - applying TRUTHS about one to the other (where they may be wrong).
There's nothing new here. In Luther's time, all this was pretty much undefined (officially) in Catholicism. But the Scriptures, the Fathers, the Creeds and the Councils were clear. Luther heard the preaching of those selling Indulgences and too often (largely ignorant) priests in parishes teaching a horrible misunderstanding, a synergistic/Pelagian MESS that was creating terror in the hearts of Catholics which the RCC was abusing (to get money out of them). Luther was EXTREMELY careful, "uber" careful- to be sure everyone understood he was speaking to justification - the GIVING, not Sanctification - the LIVING. He (and Lutheran "Fathers" after him) were SO careful that it is impossible for any to misunderstand. As a Doctor of the Church, he felt he was simply pointing out an error which the Pope would be grateful for, simply calling the Catholic Church to teach Catholicism and the Gospel, certain he was simply REFORMING an obvious error. Of course, we all know what happened as a result. At the Council of Trent, a bit after Luther's death, the RCC would finally pin this all down - but only to "justify" it's earlier condemnation of the Lutheran teaching, to justify how it called all this "heresy" and "anathema."
As for MoreCoffee's obsession over "what's ENOUGH?" Protestants tend to stress that Jesus is "enough" for the salvation He earned and gives. His Incarnation - Cross - Empty Tomb is "enough" . To argue that Jesus' work is NOT enough is to do the very thing Protestants so fundamentally, so passionately reject - that Jesus is NOT the Savior, that He goofed, and now we gotta help Him and get Him out of trouble by fixing what He goofed up, supplying what He forgot. Yes, Jesus is "enough" as SAVIOR. Yes, "Sola Gratia - Solus Christus - Sola Fide" as the gift of God IS ENOUGH for justification (narrow). Just as one can say that my conception around March 23, 1987 - that GIFT of GOD - is enough for my having life. Yes, Protestants look to the Incarnation, the Cross, the Empty Tomb and say it IS enough, Jesus didn't lie when He said "it is FINISHED." It is NOT a lie that Jesus IS the Savior, the Holy Spirit IS the GIVER of Life. THIS, we argue, is done, is finished, in this Jesus is enough. But "this" is not "all."
Is this the END of everything as some Catholics like to accuse Protestants of saying? NO! . Absolutely not. And NO Protestant on the Planet in all history known to me has said that. Protestants tend to stress (more so than Catholicism, in my experience) that God calls CHRISTIANS (ones WITH life/faith/Holy Spirit/Justification) to great things - including to love all as much as God does, to be as morally perfect as God is, to serve others as much as God does, to forgive others as God FIRST forgave us, to GIVE to others as God FIRST gave to us, to minister and serve as God FIRST ministered and served us. BECAUSE we have been given life/faith/Holy Spirit/Justification..... BECAUSE we first have received.... we are to LIVE, as Christ did. Example: Generally, being born in the USA is "enough" for that person to be an American citizen. But it's not the END of anything.... that American will need to pay taxes, serve on juries, maybe even die for the USA. But it's wrong to say that paying taxes is what makes one an American citizen. Yes, normally, those alive breathe (it might even be called a mandate!) but is self breathing the cause of the conception of self? Nope.
- Josiah
Yeah, I'm back
.