Search results

Repeating yourself again? Repeating yourself again? Repeating yourself again? Repeating yourself again? Repeating yourself again? Repeating yourself again? Repeating yourself again? Repeating yourself again? Repeating yourself again? Repeating yourself again? Repeating yourself again? Repeating...

Daniel 8 and 11 prophesy about the events in Maccabees. That already happened before Christ. But Jesus referenced Daniel 8 in the future tense, indicating that it also applies to future events. Many things are dual. Isaiah 14 says it’s about the king of Babylon, but it’s also about Satan. Psalm...

Actually Matthew’s gospel may have been written in Hebrew. But we have Matthew’s gospel in Greek, and Matthew says parthenos. That’s a Greek word, it means virgin. But the Hebrew masoretic says almah, which means young woman. So, if the Hebrew Masoretic is correct, then Matthew’s gospel is...

The book of Hebrews is referencing the content found in Maccabees. You keep repeating, and repeating, and repeating the same jargon over, and over, and over, and over again, because you just love to repeat yourself, and then repeat yourself again, and then repeat yourself again, and then repeat...

The word for virgin in Hebrew is “bethulah.” The word for virgin in Greek is “parthenos.” For example, Genesis 24 says Rebekah was a virgin. The Hebrew says bethulah and the Greek Septuagint says parthenos. Esther was a virgin. The book of Esther says the king sent messengers to round up...

Daniel chapter 11 is talking about Greek kings, one of which was north of Israel, and one of which was south of Israel. The king of the south is Ptolemy, who ruled Egypt, and the king of the north is Seleucus, who ruled most of Asia. As Andrew said, this is why Maccabees is important. Both...

No, as I’ve already said. The marginal notes were not added in the 1900’s any more than Alexander the Great defeated the Persians using machine guns and semi-automatic weapons. They didn’t exist in that time. Typewriters and computers did not exist in the 1600’s. But the printing press did. The...

It’s not missing a letter.

It’s not from the 1900’s. You’re making stuff up instead of actually researching this for yourself.

As you can see, the 1611 King James translators had the Apocrypha situated in-between the Old and New Testaments:

Here’s a screen shot from the table of contents in the original King James Bible:

Here’s Daniel 8:25 in the original 1611 KJV. It references 1 Maccabees 6:9. By the way, these are just the King James references. There’s also the Geneva Bible, originally published in 1560, and is older than the King James Version. The Geneva Bible is what the Pilgrims used. In 1620, when...

So what? The NIV had no influence on the original King James. You still don’t know what “photocopy”means?

It’s called the printing press, Genius. Invented in the 1400’s by Gutenberg. Do some research.

Nobody here except you thinks that the original KJV didn’t contain marginal notes referencing the apocrypha. You’re the only one here denying that fact. And you won’t find anyone here who is going to agree with you that this isn’t a genuine photocopy replica of the original King James. You’re...

Zoom in of marginal note in John 10:22.

The next page containing the rest of chapter 10:

Zoom in of chapter 10.

This is a screen shot from the website. This is chapter 10 of John’s gospel.

Here’s another website that has archived the original 1611 KJV. This website is easier to use. https://archive.org/details/1611TheAuthorizedKingJamesBible/page/n657/mode/2up Research it yourself.