Seriously, I don't see anything wrong with having questions and doubts. I don't see anything wrong with the metaphorical equivalent of screaming at the sky something like "God, what the (expletive) are you doing right now?"
At the same time it's important to be intellectually honest if we truly want answers. It doesn't work to offer pat answers like "you can trust the Bible because the Bible says it can be trusted" because, you know, every con artist in history has said they could be trusted too. It also doesn't work to pull at a particular verse and claim it's a contradiction when there's an easy explanation, and it doesn't work to use something like AI to debunk anything. If you feed a lot of one particular viewpoint into an AI engine you can't be surprised when it starts to act as if that viewpoint is correct as opposed to, well, a viewpoint.
Respectfully Lucian, I see a lot of doubts and questions, which are not only acceptable but normal. I honestly think anyone who has never doubted has never thought and certainly has never been tested. At the same time I see a lot of intellectual dishonesty, suggesting that because you think it might have been done better it therefore follows that God should have done better and therefore God does not have one or more of the attributes typically assigned to him.