If you want to believe the book of 1 Enoch is referencing a lizard native to the Carolinas, using as your poof the Webster’s 1828 dictionary, then by all means go for it. I feel very comfortable letting those who read this thread decide for themselves if they find your claim in any way coherent.
I did not make fun of anything. Once again you are simply making things up as you go and trying to change the topic.
So you insist that the sirens in the book of Enoch are mermaids?
Well, then you might as well insist that the KJV is mentioning mythical horse-like unicorns, half-goat men called satyrs, and a cockatrice -a dragon with a chicken’s head.
Again, these are the arguments that an atheist would make. Whatever the LXX and Enoch were referring to when mentioning “sirens” has to be some kind of real creature.
How am I not surprised that you bring up a lizard from the Carolinas? Oh, yea, like I’m going to suggest that Enoch lived in South Carolina. Yea, he also lived on a plantation and drank sweat tea. Yea, right.
This is the kind of nonsensical stuff atheists do. They “play dumb” and bring up ridiculous arguments. Obviously I’m not suggesting that Enoch lived in Carolina. But the mention of siren in Enoch has to be a real creature, just like the mention of satyrs and unicorns in the KJV has to be real creatures.
These are not convincing arguments that you’re bringing forth.