Can't think of a name
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2025
- Messages
- 213
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
Obviously I believe Jesus had the Divine nature. So he wasn't just a "mere man". But neither are people mere men when God saves them. "To all who received him, they became the sons of God". This doesn't mean humans become God but that they can unite with Him. This is also known as union with Christ in Theology. We don't become the same as God or His essence, but we partake of Him, we become one with Him. Jesus referred to this at the last supper. Another way of stating this is what is known as Theosis. It has nothing in common with modern charismatic wackos like Kenneth Copeland or anything "New Age". It's as old as Christianity itself. Irenaeus, who was a disciple of Polycarp who in turn knew the apostle John, said "God became man so that man could become God".So, @Can't think of a name, who do you think Jesus was, a mere man or God? I think he was both. He was fully human and fully God. John said it this way:
Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Joh 1:2 He was in the beginning with God.
Joh 1:3 All things were made through him, and without him was not anything made that was made.
The Father and the Person who became a man when he took on human flesh are two Persons but one God, an unfathomable Mystery. He was fully human so that he could die in our place for our forgiveness and fully divine so that he rise from the dead to give us new life.
Nothing I just wrote is a whit controversial or new. Let me repeat - this has nothing to do with the New Age movement or modern charismatics. I am not a charismatic. I think most of those types are demonized and outright frauds, deluded or simply stupid.