- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
- Messages
- 14,695
- Location
- Realms of chaos
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
You speak of my theology conveniently overlooking a few verses, where you evidently skip over the vast majority of the book in general;
I don't generally use the nkjv but can cut and paste from it so let me check something real quick;
I've cut the Scripture quotes for brevity, hoping to take up less than an entire screen.
You've cited lots of things that merely mention Jesus as "the Son of God", "the Lamb of God" and other references that mention God our Father and Jesus Christ separately. But all this is covered at the beginning of John's gospel where he writes "the Word was with God and the Word was God". The Word was both with God, and God. So Jesus was with God, and Jesus was God. So all the verses that talk of Jesus being with God align with the start of John's gospel.
Perhaps now you understand why I didn't initially quote scripture from the Bible.
Not at all, any time you want to make a case from Scripture it's good to quote at least some verses that support the point you're trying to make. It's certainly more productive than saying "please read your bibles" and "try a different version".
I can open to anywhere in the Bible to verify what I say. I think it's your turn.
I don't think any of what you have posted verifies what you say in the light of how John's gospel starts.
I do not overlook anything I read in any scripture except maybe things in parentheses, brackets, or crucifixes as they have either been added or otherwise manipulated in some manner.
I'd assume nobody believes they are overlooking anything, but when Scripture appears to contradict Scripture it's probably safe to say that at least one of the apparently contradictory passages has been misunderstood.