Agreed.
See
post # 28
I've been told by one of the teachers in my parish's First Communion Class that "Transubstantiation" has not been taught to the laity since the 1960's. The Dogma hasn't changed at all (the RCC cannot do that), it just doesn't teach it to the laity anymore. What IS taught is a combination of the Eastern Orthodox view (which holds that a CHANGE happens, they use that word, but that it's mysterious and miraculous and no attempt is made to describe it ... and what is received is the real Body and Blood of Christ, with no mention of bread and wine) and the Lutheran (and original Catholic) position that "is" means "is" so Christ's Body and Blood IS - fully present, and this presence is a divine miracle performed solely by God... bread and wine are also present but simply insignificant. Modern Catholic laity still use the word "transubstantiation" but aren't told what that word actually means... but they no longer use the word "Aristotelian accidents" but simply say "appearance."
Here's my thread as to why I left the RCC. It's old (I'd word it a bit differently - and kinder - today).
. Reasons this Catholic Became a Protestant.... I must begin by saying this was by far the hardest thing I've ever done in life.... I have Catholic roots going back CENTURIES.... my family is largely Catholic (not all active, however)... I LOVED my parish and felt deep roots there... and I...
www.christianityhaven.com
.