Search results

Is that a fact, or just your opinion? They look so similar. You know, the “experts” say the same thing about Daniel. They say that the book of Daniel could not have been written by Daniel. They say it was written hundreds of years after Daniel, and could not have been written by him. But I...

You were just giving your opinion? You said that Tobit states facts that are not true. Are you mixing up facts and opinions?

The one stating facts that are not true is you, because you believe Wikipedia. Wikipedia gets it wrong. You can’t fit the 17-year reign of Sargon into the 10-year window between Shalmaneser and Sennacherib. The fact you’re even arguing that point shows you haven’t studied 2 Kings 18. Read 2...

Study the Bible. Read 2 Kings 18. Look at the picture I sent. Wikipedia is wrong and contradicts scripture.

Besides all this, not only is what you’re saying illogical and absurd, but it’s also irrelevant. The point is that Clement lived the same time as the apostles, admits in his letter to being alive the same time as them, and in his letter references the Apocryphal books. So even if you could prove...

No, I didn’t agree with you. You’re saying absurd things like “Historians can’t know anything about history because they didn’t live back then.” That’s basically the gist of what you’re saying. No, I don’t agree with that. I guess I can’t know that the same Lincoln who was senator in...

Wow, Nathan. Thanks for sharing.

A well-respected historian said that the Clement who Paul mentions in Phillipians 4:3 is the same Clement who wrote the letter of 1 Clement, and that letter references some of the Apocryphal books as scripture. That IS at least SOME evidence. You say there’s ZERO evidence. But that’s not true...

Haha!!!! Well written and great point!!!

Sennacherib WAS Shalmaneser’s son. You can’t fit the 17-year reign of Sargon into a 10 year window between Shalmaneser and Sennacherib. Sorry, but the math doesn’t work.

DANGEROUS, a. 1. Perilous; hazardous; exposing to loss; unsafe; full of risk; as a dangerous voyage; a dangerous experiment. 2. Creating danger; causing risk of evil; as a dangerous man; a dangerous conspiracy. DANGEROUSLY, adv. With danger; with risk of evil; with exposure to injury or ruin...

You say there’s ZERO evidence that the Clement Paul mentioned in Phillipians 4:3 is Clement of Rome who wrote the letter of 1 Clement. Oh, except that a 4th-century church historian Eusebius said that they were the same. And the fact that Clement lived the same time as Paul. Oh, but there’s...

There’s literally dozens of Old Testament books that were never quoted word-for-word by Jesus or anyone else in the New Testament. But even though they’re not quoted, they’re still referenced. For example, the book of Ruth is never quoted by Jesus. But she’s mentioned in Jesus’ genealogy in...

It’s not just a few church fathers, it’s the majority. Including the ones who literally knew the disciples personally. Yea, that matters. And yea, that’s significant.

Most Mennonites today have a 66 book Bible. They eventually stopped using the Apocryphal books. Many of them don’t even know their own Anabaptist background.

Jews removed things from scripture Way back in 90 AD. Christians have been arguing about it ever since. Simple as that. Protestants are just the first Christians to actually remove those books from the main body of text and place them in a separate section, and then a few hundred years later...

“Scripture Alone! (Except the ones I took out)” -Luther

Germans don’t get to decide what belongs in the Bible. God decides. Germany has a sad history of desposing of things that they deemed “non-essential”.

I would get a sheet of paper and write the numbers 1, 2, and 3. Then I’d ask them, “How many numbers do you see?” When they say, “three numbers,” then I’ll say, “Wrong.” There’s only 1 number. The number “One Hundred Twenty Three.” Granted, that one number consists of 3 digits. And each digit...

What cults do you know of? And which ones do you think are the most dangerous?