Search results

Unidentified and unnamed? I’m talking about you, Buddy. And whoever it was that made the website claiming that Zero Christians prior to 1546 accepted the Apocrypha as canon. You said it, and the makers of that website said it. And it’s FACTUALLY and HISTORICALLY inaccurate.

73 is the 21st prime number. Its mirror 37 is the 12th prime number 12 is the mirror of 21. 21 is the product of 7 x 3.

It’s hilarious. But it’s more than funny. It shows that there’s something significant about the number 73.

Yes, Paul had Maccabees in his Bible. Paul references Maccabees in Hebrews 11:35. The New Testament proves that Maccabees was in the disciples’ Bibles.

Just whatever you think is most dangerous. Danger of any kind.

Like, does Maccabees say that money can save dead relatives from purgatory? Does Tobit endorse the use of magical potions? So like, you’re not allowed to use ingredients from plants and animals for anything because they’re all magical potions? Like, what are some doctrinal errors?

The problem is that Protestants are spreading blatant lies that are factually and historically untrue, and can be undeniably proven to be untrue. They say that ZERO Christians accepted them as scripture before 1546. That’s a lie. That is a factual, historical error. They make many similar errors...

You’re saying that ZERO Christians prior to 1546 accepted the Apocryphal books as divine canonical scripture? If that’s what you think, then you are mistaken. What you believe is FACTUALLY and HISTORICALLY inaccurate. Do a simple internet search of the church councils of Rome, Hippo, and...

Have you seen that clip from Big Bang Theory about the number 73?

Who’s “THEY”? Be specific!!!! Are you saying the church leaders of Rome, Hippo, and Carthage didn’t include the Apocryphal books within the list of divine canonical scriptures? Because they most certainly DID! Read it! Or are you talking about someone else? Who are you talking about? Who’s...

Well, if you want to watch it then you can go to 2000mules.com and buy/rent it from the places where they’re selling it.

What you’re saying is not helpful, since most Christians are told not to buy a Bible that includes the Apocryphal books since they think it’s Catholic. Most Christian book stores don’t even contain Catholic Bibles. You gotta go to a Catholic book store or a secular book store in most cases for...

73 is an interesting number

The thing is, though, the fact that the Apocryphal books talk about praying for the dead, that’s not the REAL reason Christians reject the Apocrypha. The only REAL reason is because the Jews today reject it. If the Jews today accepted 2 Maccabees as holy scripture, then Protestant Christians...

I think Protestants should accept AT LEAST the 73 book canon, since it’s the correct thing to do. Forget about the Protestant thing to do, and forget about the Catholic thing to do. I care about the RIGHT thing to do. The right thing is to include the “Apocrypha” (though it’s not really...

You didn’t SEE them at 10 drop boxes. But their cell phone was at 10 drop boxes.

Of course it wouldn’t be wrong. But why do you have to visit 10 drop boxes? And why at 3am? And why wearing rubber gloves?

Do you know what the arguments were of the Puritans and Presbyterians in the early 1800’s when they lobbied against the printing of the Apocryphal section in the Bible? (I’m asking for THEIR arguments back then, not modern-day arguments that people give today)...

I think we can safely say that the Apocryphal books were in every Christian-approved Bible from the start of Christianity up until the 1600’s. In the 1500’s, the “Apocryphal” books (so-called) were removed from the main body of text and placed in a separate section FOR THE FIRST TIME in the...