Search results

Don’t freshwater fish die in saltwater? [emoji225] [emoji226] [emoji1655] [emoji228] [emoji229] [emoji227]

According to mythology, it’s like a lizard with a rooster head. But what is the Bible talking about?

Do you agree with their interpretation of Daniel’s prophecy? Do you think Maccabees belongs in the Bible?

The word for virgin in Hebrew is “bethulah.” The word for virgin in Greek is “parthenos.” For example, Genesis 24 says Rebekah was a virgin. The Hebrew says bethulah and the Greek Septuagint says parthenos. Esther was a virgin. The book of Esther says the king sent messengers to round up...

Here it is in the ESV: “Know therefore and understand that from the going out of the word to restore and build Jerusalem to the coming of an anointed one, a prince, there shall be seven weeks. Then for sixty-two weeks it shall be built again with squares and moat, but in a troubled time. And...

When he said, “You do not support the root, but the root supports you.”

Picture taken from John 10:22 in the original 1611 King James. The Feast of Dedication is the Feast of Hanukkah, as shown in this marginal note. Jesus celebrated the Maccabees? But they told me that the New Testament never acknowledges the Apocrypha. ???????

Which interests you the most to visit and view first hand [emoji870]?

Abraham entertained angels, but he knew they were angels. He bowed down to them and said, “Lord.” Lot entertained angels. But he knew they were angels. He bowed down to them the moment they set foot in Sodom. There’s nothing in the Old Testament or New Testament that has people entertaining...

Then Rebekah lifted her eyes, and when she saw Isaac she dismounted from her camel; for she had said to the servant, “Who is this man walking in the field to meet us?” The servant said, “It is my master.” So she took a veil and covered herself. Genesis 24:64-65 - Bible Gateway passage: Genesis...

I mean, it’s not the Bible that was used by the early church. In fact, it’s radically different than the Bible of the early church. Why should this 17th century translation be placed on such a high pedestal? Shouldn’t the Bible of the early church be the revered translation?

You wouldn’t have the ability to love if God did not first love you.

In Hebrews 11:35, it says: “Women received their dead raised to life again. Others were tortured, not accepting deliverance, that they might obtain a better resurrection.” -Hebrews 11:35 (NKJV) Now, when it says women received their dead raised to life, that’s talking about Elijah and Elisha...

Dinosaurs went extinct millions of years before man. But the Bible says they were made on the same day.

Like, was there some problem with Nebuchadnezzar?

Like for example, is there anything that exists that God didn’t create?

And if Maccabees is missing from our modern Bibles, doesn’t this discourage Christians from reading Maccabees? Wouldn’t this then stunt people’s ability to understand the prophecies in Daniel?

Does it belong in the Bible?

I’m not talking about today, of course. But in Old Testament times.

Is it because they haven’t found it in Hebrew or Aramaic? Because it takes place during the 400 silent years between the Testaments? Because it wasn’t written by a prophet? Because it’s not referenced in the New Testament? Because modern medicine disprove its claim that fish guts can...