yup he moved the goal posts ..typical
josiah will be most upset
Who moved what goal post? Are you speaking of Mr. Thomas Muenzer, who in the 16th Century inventing the new practice of withholding baptism from those under the age of X?
The sole issue here (and the only one I've thus discussed) is Mr. Thomas Muenzer's invention in the 16th Century of
anti-
paedobaptism, dogmatically insisting that the Bible states we are forbidden to baptize those under the age of X and thus are to withhold it from those under that age, this overturning the view from 69 AD at the very latest, the universal view of every Christian for some 1,500 years, that we are not forbidden in Scripture from baptizing those who have not yet celebrated "X" number of birthdays since their birth.
Some insist that Scripture states that a person must REPENT before we are permitted to allow baptism - but they can't seem to find any verse that remotely says that.
Some insist that Scripture states that a person must BELIEVE before we are permitted to allow baptism - but they can't seem to find any verse that remotely says that.
Some insist that Scripture states that a person must CONSENT to this before we are permitted to allow baptism - but they can't seem to find any verse that remotely says that.
Then some insist that we aren't to follow the teaching of Scripture but rather the examples that happened to be recorded in Scripture - problem is, they can't show that only those over the age of X were baptized and those under that age were forbidden (and of course, they then go on to document that they don't believe or apply their own rubric - that we can only do what is exampled in Scripture).
This German layman in the 16th Century invented this new tradition, one now followed by a very small percentage of Christians (but common in American "Evangelicalism" today). We're discussing his protest, his denial of the old (from at last 69 AD at the latest) universal practice of NOT withholding it from those under the age of X.
Thank you.
Pax
- Josiah
.