Tradition

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Tradition:


Catholic Definition:


1. It's the RCC alone and exclusively that determines what Tradition is:


"It is the Authoritative Voice of the Catholic Church which determines what is to be accepted and rejected as Tradition." The Handbook of the Catholic Faith, page 151



2. It's the RCC itself alone that determines the meaning of this Tradition that it itself alone chooses.

"The task of giving an authentic interpretation of the Word of God, whether in its written form or in the form of Tradition, has been entrusted to the living, teaching office of the [Catholic] Church alone. This means that the task of interpretation has been entrusted to the bishops in communion with the successor of Peter, the bishop of Rome." Catholic Catechism # 85



3. This "Tradition" as the RCC alone has chooses and as the RCC itself alone interprets, is not accountable to God's Scriptures but is EQUAL and supplemental to it.

"The [Catholic] Church does not derive its certainty about truth from the holy Scriptures alone. But both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted and honored with equal sentiments." Catholic Catechism # 82

"Sacred Tradition, Sacred Scripture and the Magisterium (the Bishops) of the [Catholic] Church are so connected and associated that one of them cannot stand without the other. Working together, they all contribute...." Catholic Catechism # 95


Realize, too, that this Holy Scripture which is equal to the Tradition as the RCC itself alone as chosen as it itself alone interprets, is....

"Scripture is written principally in the heart of the [Catholic] Church rather than in documents or records, for the [Catholic] Church carries in its Tradition the living memory... ' Catholic Catechism # 113


In Catholicism, there are 3 equal "streams" of revelation: Tradition (dogmas taught by Jesus and the Apostles, much of which the Holy Spirit chose not to include in Scripture), Scripture (not the words so much as the meaning that the RCC alone knows) and Leadership of the singular, individual RCC. These "three legs of the stool" or "three streams" flow into ONE "river" - which is the Truth and is both the source and norm for all Christian truth. The 3 are fully interconnected, so that what is in one MUST be in all 3 (even if by pure implication that only the RCC can "see") since all are divine revelation. So if the Magisterium said something in 1904, that MUST be taught in Scripture since all 3 stools agree with each other.

This fundamental concept of "hidden dogmas" is key to the Catholic understanding of Tradition. It is typically called "Apostolic Tradition" because the claim is that the Apostles all taught these dogmas. The RCC is honest to admit there is zero evidence for this, the claim is not at all historical, but is a belief.

And it must be appreciated that all 3 legs of the stool or 3 streams are - essentially - the RCC itself. It's the anti-thesis of ecumenical.




Protestant Definition:


Anglicans, Lutherans, and sometimes Methodist and Reformed Protestants speak of "tradition" in several way:


1. It refers to the historic, ecumenical, consensus of God's people (the oikos of God), especially (but not exclusively) regarding the interpretation and application of Scriptures. This if often held in very high esteem, but at least a tad under God's written words, the Bible (as indeed Protestants tend to regard the words of men as under the Word of God). Examples would be the Apostles and Nicene Creeds. Lutherans hold that the Scriptures were not given to any individual person or denomination... or even generation... but to US, the whole church, the whole people of God, and so Tradition (capitol T) is ecumenical and historic.


2. The historic, consensus and generally official teachings of the specific theological community. In Lutheranism, we call this type of Tradition, "Confessions." This is not ecumenical since it may be distinctive to a faith community (such as Lutheran or Reformed or Anglican). For example, the "Lutheran Confessions" (the Book of Concord), the Reformed Confessions. The Lutheran Book of Concord (unchanged since 1580 - with no additions, revisions, developments or expansions) begins with the 3 ecumenical creeds - in a category unto themselves, then addresses the Lutheran Confessions.


3. The historic and broadly accepted customs and practices of God's people - which may be ecumenical or perhaps more limited in terms of time or community. Especially worshipping on Sundays is an example of this kind of tradition (usually a lower case "t" is used here).



- Josiah




.
 
Last edited:

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
32,653
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I thought the EOs have Tradition as well?
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I thought the EOs have Tradition as well?


ALL do. But I didn't not specify the EOC because, to be frank, I'm not familiar with how it is viewed in the EOC.

I have (well, we're not in contact now) a friend who is (very!) Greek Orthodox and for some years, we chatted (in person and in emails). She spoke often of "Tradition" but I always got the impression she meant it in the Protestant sense since she stressed the ECUMENICAL Councils and ECUMENICAL Creeds. And if I recall correctly, said that the EOC cannot do anything about much of anything for some 1200 years because there are no ECUMENICAL Councils anymore. So, the impression I got was Tradition in the EOC must be historic and ecumenical, not the "self currently says to self" concept of the RCC. But yes, there is much mention of Tradition.

IMO, EVERY Christian holds to a lot of Tradition (whether they realize or admit it or not). Indeed, the Bible-thumping Fundamentalist shouts "The Bible and nothin' but the Bible!" but why do we accept those 66 (or whatever number) books ARE the Bible? One word: Tradition. I think most historic faith communities are fairly up-front about this but a lot of the Evangelical and newbies aren't. And of course, there is denomination Tradition, too (Lutherans call this "Confessions") which I address as the second meaning of the term in Protestantism. As now a Lutheran, I admit to this working in my epistemology - but I hold it down the list of authorities, under Scripture and under Tradition in the historic/ecumenical sense. Many of the posters here display a very strong adhearance to there denominational Tradition, and I'm more than fine with that - as long as they realize and admit this IS Tradition.

Lamm, I've found that Christians are pretty bad about throwing around BIG words that they never really define, words that often mean radically different things to different faith communities. Sometimes, laity parrot these words without even realizing how their teachers/pastors mean them. It makes for a lot of "talking past each other" and confusion. I'm reminded of another issue (currently at CH), "No Creed but the Bible!" Which is, of course, a creed (and one never found in the Bible).


Does that help?


A blessed Epiphany to you and yours....



- Josiah
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
32,653
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
We can ask the EO's who are here? LOL

I'll call [MENTION=33]George[/MENTION] to come forth!
 

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I thought the EOs have Tradition as well?

Be careful of how this is worded (or spelled). Everybody has a place somewhere in their thinking for traditions . BUT when we speak of Tradition in the singular and with a capital T, we are referring to Sacred Tradition or Holy Tradition which some churches--EO among them--consider to be an alternative to Scripture, another divine revelation and equally authoritative as the Bible.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Be careful of how this is worded (or spelled). Everybody has a place somewhere in their thinking for traditions . BUT when we speak of Tradition in the singular and with a capital T, we are referring to Sacred Tradition or Holy Tradition which some churches--EO among them--consider to be an alternative to Scripture, another divine revelation and equally authoritative as the Bible.



EXACTLY!!!

In my experience, Christians tend to be HORRIBLE with their sloppy language.... using BIG words but never really defining exactly what they mean. It means to a lot of confusion and misunderstanding. I TRIED to briefly address some of this in the opening post but that IS the issue here; what we MEAN by the term and how we USE it.
 

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Yes. And I think it applies especially with this one. It is typical for Catholics to denigrate Sola Scriptura by saying "well, you guys have traditions, too!" But they are speaking of something different...and the Protestant who is on the receiving end of that false analysis has, often times, made it possible himself by not keeping the different meanings of similar terms separate in his own comments.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Yes. And I think it applies especially with this one. It is typical for Catholics to denigrate Sola Scriptura by saying "well, you guys have traditions, too!" But they are speaking of something different...and the Protestant who is on the receiving end of that false analysis has, often times, made it possible himself by not keeping the different meanings of similar terms separate in his own comments.


Bingo. Happens a lot.
 

Arsenios

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
3,577
Location
Pacific North West
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Eastern Orthodox
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
I thought the EOs have Tradition as well?

We are bound by the Holy Tradition of the Church which includes the Gospels, the Epistles, Revelation, and the OT Canon and the Order of Worship of the Churches...

As well, it includes the teaching and discipling of the Faith to those called to the Church...

The Church out of which the NT Bible emerged is the worshipping Body that is qualified to know what it means...

It was not even understood in ancient times outside the Ekklesia of Christ [Who is Her Head]...

It is not understood academically, but by the praxis of the Faith...

A secular Orthodox Christian cannot be an interpreter of Biblical meaning, no matter how educated...

But a pious illiterate farmer can be... St. Spyridon comes readily to mind...

Purification of the heart is the epistemological prerequisite of interpreting the Bible...

And even that is but a beginning...

That is the problem with the Scholasticism of the Latins and the Neo-Scholasticism of their Reformational antagonists...

This Faith is a Mystery, and not a Scholastic undertaking...

A Theologian is a person who KNOWS God...

Very few of these write about it...

They live it instead...


Arsenios
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
7,102
Age
54
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Married
Purification of the heart is the epistemological prerequisite of interpreting the Bible...
Arsenios
Since the heart is desperately wicked it seems that your leaders will never get it right...
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,208
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Be careful of how this is worded (or spelled). Everybody has a place somewhere in their thinking for traditions . BUT when we speak of Tradition in the singular and with a capital T, we are referring to Sacred Tradition or Holy Tradition which some churches--EO among them--consider to be an alternative to Scripture, another divine revelation and equally authoritative as the Bible.

Apostolic tradition is not - as you incorrectly say - another divine revelation.
 

Arsenios

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
3,577
Location
Pacific North West
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Eastern Orthodox
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Since the heart is desperately wicked it seems that your leaders will never get it right...

Hence our profound need for repentance...

Which is why the Gospel is the Command to be repenting...


Arsenios
 

Arsenios

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
3,577
Location
Pacific North West
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Eastern Orthodox
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Apostolic tradition is not - as you incorrectly say - another divine revelation.

It is THE Divine Revelation of Jesus Christ's Ministry...

Revealed to His Apostles...

That they disciple ALL the Nations in it...


Arsenios
 
Last edited:

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
7,102
Age
54
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Married
Hence our profound need for repentance...

Which is why the Gospel is the Command to be repenting...


Arsenios
You can repent until your dead. Your heart will still be desperately wicked.
The Gospel is the realization that God reconciles you despite your wickedness, purely because God chooses you to display His redeeming grace.
Repentance comes as an effect of the Gospel of Reconciliation. It is not the cause of our reconciliation with God.
You have it backwards, Arsenios.
 

Arsenios

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
3,577
Location
Pacific North West
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Eastern Orthodox
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
You can repent until your dead. Your heart will still be desperately wicked.

Then you make God a liar...

The Gospel is the realization

False - The Gospel is the Commandment of God to repent...

that God reconciles you despite your wickedness, purely because God chooses you to display His redeeming grace.
Repentance comes as an effect of the Gospel of Reconciliation. It is not the cause of our reconciliation with God.
You have it backwards, Arsenios.

1Pe 4:17
For the time is come
that judgment must begin at the house of God:
and if it first begin at us,
what shall the end be of them
that obey not the Gospel of God?


Your argument is with the Bible...

The Gospel must be obeyed...

REPENT!


Arsenios
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Apostolic tradition is not - as you incorrectly say - another divine revelation.




In the RCC, it's one "leg" or "steam" that forms one revelation/truth. See the opening post. Your comment is technically correct NOT because Tradition is not seen as equally revelatory and normative but because it's seen as part of one revelation; you "got" Albion on an insignificant technicality.

The concept that Jesus and the Apostles taught a bunch of dogmas that the Holy Spirit in His divine wisdom chose to not include in the divine Scriptures - whether as one "leg" or "stream" or at all - is not a Protestant dogma. It's foundational in the RCC (as well as the LDS and a few other non-Protestant denominations). "Tradition" thus has a very different definition. See the opening post.
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
7,102
Age
54
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Married
Then you make God a liar...



False - The Gospel is the Commandment of God to repent...



1Pe 4:17
For the time is come
that judgment must begin at the house of God:
and if it first begin at us,
what shall the end be of them
that obey not the Gospel of God?


Your argument is with the Bible...

The Gospel must be obeyed...

REPENT!


Arsenios
Arsenios, your entire premise here is wrong and a terrible misuse of scripture to create a false gospel. Your conclusion is similar to the Judaisers whom Paul condemned.
Is this how your tradition has screwed up the gospel or is this your own rogue gospel thinking?
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
7,102
Age
54
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Married
Acts 5:30-32
30The God of our fathers*raised Jesus,*whom you killed by hanging him on*a tree.*31God exalted*him at his right hand as*Leader and*Savior,*to give*repentance to Israel and*forgiveness of sins.*32And*we are witnesses to these things, and*so is the Holy Spirit,*whom God has given to those who obey him.”
Notice in verse 31 where Peter says that God gives repentance to Israel. The elect is Israel (the children of the promise). God gives us repentance. Repentance is an effect of God's work in the elect. Repentance is not the cause of God's work. We don't merit God's grace by the repentance we show.
 

Arsenios

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
3,577
Location
Pacific North West
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Eastern Orthodox
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Acts 5:30-32

Notice in verse 31 where Peter says that God gives repentance to Israel. The elect is Israel (the children of the promise). God gives us repentance. Repentance is an effect of God's work in the elect. Repentance is not the cause of God's work. We don't merit God's grace by the repentance we show.

Menno, thank you for engaging Scripture here.

vs 31, using your translation, states:

"God exalted Him [Christ] at His Right Hand to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins."

What this means is that without this exaltation of Christ at the Right Hand of the Father, repentance and forgiveness would not have been possible...

And notice the order and to my eyes the the linkage of first repentance, and then the forgiveness that comes through it...

You are right to say repentance is of God, for without God there is no repentance...

But so is sin, for without God we cannot sin...

Because without God there is no existence...

This passage is clearly not saying that repentance is a gift that God hands to man tied up in a bow with all the work for it done by God and all man has to do is put on his cool shades and catch some rays, 'cause it's a done deal...

If God calls someone to repentance, they are still free to repent or not to repent...

God does not repent for you...

Sin and death are your enemies...

God is not your enemy if you do not repent...

God is long-suffering in His love for us "oh so ever prodigal" sinners...

He came to CALL sinners to REPENTANCE, remember?


Arsenios
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
7,102
Age
54
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Married
Menno, thank you for engaging Scripture here.

vs 31, using your translation, states:

"God exalted Him [Christ] at His Right Hand to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins."

What this means is that without this exaltation of Christ at the Right Hand of the Father, repentance and forgiveness would not have been possible...

And notice the order and to my eyes the the linkage of first repentance, and then the forgiveness that comes through it...

You are right to say repentance is of God, for without God there is no repentance...

But so is sin, for without God we cannot sin...

Because without God there is no existence...

This passage is clearly not saying that repentance is a gift that God hands to man tied up in a bow with all the work for it done by God and all man has to do is put on his cool shades and catch some rays, 'cause it's a done deal...

If God calls someone to repentance, they are still free to repent or not to repent...

God does not repent for you...

Sin and death are your enemies...

God is not your enemy if you do not repent...

God is long-suffering in His love for us "oh so ever prodigal" sinners...

He came to CALL sinners to REPENTANCE, remember?


Arsenios

What it means is that only the elect receive saving grace, saving faith and repentance. God gives repentance to his chosen people.

Why is it that you won't accept God as Sovereign who decides apart from any thing you try to merit on your own? Does your tradition deny God his place of Sovereignty?
 
Top Bottom