Is Immersion required by Scripture when a baptism is performed?

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
No, it isn't. We are really immersed in the Spirit of God.

You might as well have just agreed with me straight away and saved yourself the trouble of trying to show how the analogy is not an analogy if that's what you were going to come up with.
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
7,102
Age
54
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Married
How about the outPOURing of the Holy Spirit?
What about it?
Does the Bible say we are outpoured with the Spirit or baptized in the Spirit?
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
7,102
Age
54
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Married
Sorry, no. He did so repeatedly. The following is only one example:
Why wouldn't we place God's word over and above traditions?
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
32,653
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
What about it?
Does the Bible say we are outpoured with the Spirit or baptized in the Spirit?

Shouldn't you start a new thread for talking about the Holy Spirit since this seems to be a tangent? It's not going to prove immersion only, btw.
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
7,102
Age
54
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Married
You might as well have just agreed with me straight away and saved yourself the trouble of trying to show how the analogy is not an analogy if that's what you were going to come up with.
It is a reality. When God adopts us, He also baptizes us into Christ. It goes back to Galatians 2:20.
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
7,102
Age
54
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Married
Shouldn't you start a new thread for talking about the Holy Spirit since this seems to be a tangent? It's not going to prove immersion only, btw.
No. We are talking about baptism and immersion. You want the word to only be connected with water. The Bible connects the word baptizo to other things beside water. Therefore immersion, as you point out, can refer to more than symbolic baptism in water. I'm on topic. I am pointing out the fallacy of your narrow focus.
 

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
No. We are talking about baptism and immersion. You want the word to only be connected with water.
The thread is only concerned with sacramental baptism and whether immersion in water is required.
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
7,102
Age
54
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Married
The thread is only concerned with sacramental baptism and whether immersion in water is required.
Got it. This is a silly thread. Sorry I got involved.
 

user1234

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 2, 2017
Messages
1,654
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Other Church
Marital Status
Separated
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Sorry, but it is not. BUT EVEN IF THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED, it doesn't do a thing towards proving that baptisms MUST be by submersion.


DID I say that it IS a requirement for salvation? If not, let's avoid using strawman arguments like this one.

Don't mock me, please, if you want to communicate something to me.

Really? Says the one doing the mocking and the strawman arguements, and the twisting of scripture and posts?! Lol.

When did I say MUST?
Can you comprehend the difference between things like 'most reasonable' 'most probable' 'most likely' etc., and your false accusation of the use of the word 'MUST' ?

Did I say you said it was a requirement?
If not, you know what you can do with your bogus strawman accusation, and look at the real strawman arguer in the mirror.

I made the statement to confirm for Imalive that water-baptism is not a requirement for salvation.
Read the post. It's not my fault you made it self-condemnation.

It's true, water-baptism is not a requirement for salvation.
It's also true that the exact method (immersion, sprinkling, flicking a thing like your pope uses, (idk what it's called), river, swimmingpool, whatever), is really not that vitally important, to the extreme some make it out to be.

And immersion in the river is the most likely and reasonable way that John baptised Jesus and others, and most closely represents the symbolism of identifying with Jesus being buried in death an rising from the grave.

Now if you want to twist and butcher that into claiming I said ppl MUST be immersed, or that they MUST be immersed in a river for it to 'count', you go right ahead, but any HONEST person can plainly see that's not what I said, and you can't accuse me of it again without lying. But that's your choice.
------------------------------------------------------------
*The following ↓ posts wont 'uncheck',
they're from an earlier post, I keep unchecking the re-quote option, but they keep showing back up as being checked, so I guess I have to keep posting them until the glitch fixes itself. ↓

Infant baptism is neither commanded nor forbidden so why would a Christian say it is important?
atpollard has provided a data driven reasoning based upon the word choice used in Scripture. This is solid data, yet ultimately people gravitate to their denominational stance regardless of its biblical support.

or: you got baptized in a swimming pool, but it had to be living water. Ah. A pity. I looked that up. They always used rivers and such. It had to be living water. I did it wrong!!!!!! I need to get rebaptized!
 

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Really? Says the one doing the mocking and the strawman arguements, and the twisting of scripture and posts?! Lol.

When did I say MUST?
It was meant more as a clarification. If that wasn't a point you agreed with but it was someone else, then I'm glad for the correction. SO...there is no presumption that Jesus was baptised by immersion simply because it took place in a river.

Did I say you said it was a requirement?
You were addressing me and had quoted me. Anyway, if it's agreed now that baptism is not a requirement for salvation, that's also settled.

If not, you know what you can do with your bogus strawman accusation, and look at the real strawman arguer in the mirror.
Ooooh. Good-bye, then.
 

user1234

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 2, 2017
Messages
1,654
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Other Church
Marital Status
Separated
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
It was meant more as a clarification. If that wasn't a point you agreed with but it was someone else, then I'm glad for the correction. SO...there is no presumption that Jesus was baptised by immersion simply because it took place in a river.


You were addressing me and had quoted me. Anyway, if it's agreed now that baptism is not a requirement for salvation, that's also settled.

Ooooh. Good-bye, then.

No need to run and hide.
Wow, what is it with ppl around here?
You dished some false accusations at me, so I pointed them out and dished them right back at you. So what?!
It's not the end of the world, and it doesnt have to be the end of this conversation, but even if it IS, it doesnt have to be the end of a friendship.

Geez, are you not saved? (I'm not allowed to assume one way or the other on this site) But if so, so then are we not brothers?
I tell ya, chatforum christians need to be a little more honest both in their walk AND their talk, and quit being so wimpy and quick to throw each other aside or under the bus just bc they might disagree over a secondary issue, especially on a thread that has turned as silly as this one. Wow, it doesnt do much to get the enemy worried.
---
Bottom line is, what you call here a clarification in that other post, was coupled with a false accusation at me and an apparent attempt to put me in a place I wasnt about to go.

I never said ppl MUST be immersed, which is what you accused me of by implication in quoting my post.

I never said you claimed that waterbap was a requirement of salvation, which is also what you accused me of saying.

I quoted 3 posts in mine... Mennosota , Imalive , and you.
My point of waterbap not being a requirement was clearly for Ima (which she knows, anyway, I was just confirming her position, I understood her point about 'doing baptism wrong'.)
My reply to her was really for ANYONE who might dare to tell her that waterbap was a requirement.

THEN, my re-quote of your post followed, and I addressed that.
Perhaps I should have split it into different posts so's not to confuse you, but I thought the general rule was to re-quote the other persons post first, and then post a reply to it after, not the other way around.
---
But in this post, I disagree with your point about not presuming Jesus was immersed ... Also with your statement that it's based ONLY on the fact that it was in a river.

I clearly stated that atpollard made an excellent point in clarifying the meaning and majority use of the word in scripture, and that, combined with MennoSota making the excellent point about our being buried and risen with Jesus in SPIRITUAL baptism, that the symbolism of PHYSICAL baptism of being 'buried' in the water by immersion and risen from the grave (water) is the most reasonable position.

NOW, combine that with the fact that John was already in the water, ceremonially baptising (cleansing) sinners from their sins, in an O T type of law-keeping ceremony, it makes sense that they were being immersed.

Jesus came along, and though He was without sin, He was baptised, bc He did not come to bypass or abolish the law, but to fulfill all righteousness...He fulfilled all the law and the prophets (for us, Hallelujah, thank you, Jesus!)

So the presumption of immersion can VERY MUCH be presumed with much confidence, based on all that.
Notice I didnt say He MUST have, or WE MUST, but it is HIGHLY LIKELY that that is how it was done.
---
For anyone that plans to try the bogus accusation that anyone here says immersion is THE ONLY POSSIBLE MEANING of the word, ... Pfffff, no one said that. For anyone that wants to say that immersion is the ONLY ACCEPTABLE METHOD, ..., Pfffff, no one said that, so quit making water-baptism a religious-works-requirement for salvation, whoever might try.

Meanwhile, I personally dont worry too much HOW ppl get baptised, or even IF (I'm talking about water, ok? No more twisting meanings, ok?!)

It should be a joyful ceremony symbolizing that we've been saved by grace thru faith in the finished work of our Lord Jesus Christ...His death burial and resurrection for us. God bless you, okay?
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
32,653
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Geez, are you not saved? (I'm not allowed to assume one way or the other on this site) But if so, so then are we not brothers?
I tell ya, chatforum christians need to be a little more honest both in their walk AND their talk, and quit being so wimpy and quick to throw each other aside or under the bus just bc they might disagree over a secondary issue, especially on a thread that has turned as silly as this one. Wow, it doesnt do much to get the enemy worried.

PLEASE address the topic and not the people! No more flaming...eg (means example): quit being so wimpy
 

Andrew

Matt 18:15
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
6,645
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Nvrmnd.

Edit: I believe the argument is about if it means "submersed" or not. If you were born Catholic at least your head will get into heaven, Achillis' heel type situation.
 
Last edited:

user1234

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 2, 2017
Messages
1,654
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Other Church
Marital Status
Separated
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Nvrmnd.

Edit: I believe the argument is about if it means "submersed" or not. If you were born Catholic at least your head will get into heaven, Achillis' heel type situation.

Do they hold you by the ankles and dunk your head in?!
 

Andrew

Matt 18:15
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
6,645
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
That You Tube video appears to picture some sort of ceremony in an Hispanic parish of the Roman Catholic Church, but who knows what it is? It is not a baptism, and Catholics do not any of those *dedication* services as practiced in churches that do not baptize young children. The narration--courtesy of *Rus News* (?)--is even worse, though.
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
32,653
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
That You Tube video appears to picture some sort of ceremony in an Hispanic parish of the Roman Catholic Church, but who knows what it is? It is not a baptism, and Catholics do not any of those *dedication* services as practiced in churches that do not baptize young children. The narration--courtesy of *Rus News* (?)--is even worse, though.

I agree. Basing an opinion on someone's extreme video from a small country doesn't make infant baptism invalid.

Scripture does not demand immersion. God is very explicit in His instructions when there is a need for it but to concentrate on the amount of water and neglect God's promises is where the confusion lies.
 
Top Bottom