- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
- Messages
- 14,695
- Location
- Realms of chaos
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
oh noo not the old .. god doesn't always heal because timothy wasn't line again.. lets just ignore every account of every healing in the bible and sow doubt into everyone because it says tim was sick.. -did he die? nope .. so i guess he recovered (just as it says in james ).
Im not trying to make any point ..im simply agreeing with the lord jesus ..because he is the truth (absolute ) and im not agreeing with him based on my comprehension but simply because he said it and he is truth . shall i cease from believing because some come along and says .."ouhh but timothy wasn't healed ".. well NO! i will not nor will i encourage any one in any thing but to learn, develop and grow into absolute FAith with childlike simplicity and obedience that they may be built up (edified) i the most Holy Faith .
Everything the lord sees us go through he uses to further develop his character in us .. therefore we give thanks in all things and realize that sometimes delayed healing of the body works healing correction of the soul and uncovers the sincerity of a person's faith .
but never will i preach anything that even remotely implies that "God cannot" .. as more often it is us that "will not believe" .
I don't see anybody saying God doesn't heal, you're throwing more strawmen out there.
If you want to claim that God always heals (which was pretty much the original premise of the thread) then a single situation in which God did not heal means the theory needs to be re-examined. It only takes one. If you have a room with a million sick people in it and 999,999 of them are healed, it is not true to say that God healed everybody. So commenting about rejecting every account of every healing in the Bible falls totally flat because that backs my stance rather than yours. My stance, that God sometimes heals, is supported by the Bible. Your stance, that God always heals, is not because Timothy's situation demonstrates a case where God did not heal. My stance, that God heals in some but not all situations, is entirely consistent with Timothy's not being healed. The stance that God always heals is not, and therefore needs to explain why Timothy was not healed or why a universal guarantee applies to everybody except Timothy.
Did he die? Presumably he did at some point, but that's not the issue here, it's just another deflection from the topic at hand. The point is he wasn't healed, just like many today are not healed. If you want to say that he recovered and therefore everything counts you're effectively saying "God didn't heal him but he got over it" as proof that God heals everybody. To be perfectly honest that reasoning plumbs new levels of absurdity.
There's no need to carry on with the "I'm agreeing with Jesus" line as if nobody else is. If anything you're the one not in alignment with the word of God because the word of God clearly shows a situation where a man of God was not healed, and therefore the idea that "God always heals" is demonstrably false.
If you cut away the fallacies, the strawmen, the dodging and the deflections, and the irrelevant posturing then maybe we could get to the root of the matter. If some people are healed and some people are not healed then it is not true to say that everybody is healed. That's basic reasoning. If you want to continue to believe in something that is demonstrably not true that is your absolute right but let's not be pretending that you're taking a moral, spiritual or intellectual high ground by doing so. If you want to believe that God can and does heal that's entirely consistent with Scripture and with experience. If you want to believe that God always heals then Timothy's case will be a thorn in the side until you either master doublethink or explain it.
Frankly your post is so full of strawmen there's very little left once they are all removed. Nobody said "God cannot", merely "God does not". Unless God somehow lost his status as God he gets to choose what he does and when, so "God chose not to heal" is a perfectly valid situation. Can you point to a single post here that says God cannot do anything? If not, I guess that's just another strawman.