The Character or Form of God

[Manonfire63]

I come from a Family that was in Freemasonry. On my mom's side, my grandpa and great grandpa. Growing up, I actually looked up to my grandpa. He was one of my favorite people. Freemasonry never came up in my family.....except as a teenager, researching things, and I brought it up. My mom was against it.

As a 30 something year old man, working for God, I shook my mom down.

A lot of Christians may have been under a generational curse due to Freemasonry. I was. I had to identify it to remove it.

 

[Lees]

Oh please! The burden of proof lays upon you. However, even this forum can be a set up, not just you. Exalt Mother Mary according to the promise. As I have said, what's at the front door can simply be a hook. " You will know them by their fruits". The little interaction I have had with you is very telling.

No. Just because one makes the accusation doesn't mean I have the burden to prove anything. The burden lies with the accuser. Which is why I asked, 'what did I write that made you think I am a Mason'?

And, since you entered into that accusation, then you need to show proof. In the meantime, show me proof you're a woman, as you claim.

Lees

 

[Lees]

I come from a Family that was in Freemasonry. On my mom's side, my grandpa and great grandpa. Growing up, I actually looked up to my grandpa. He was one of my favorite people. Freemasonry never came up in my family.....except as a teenager, researching things, and I brought it up. My mom was against it.

As a 30 something year old man, working for God, I shook my mom down.

A lot of Christians may have been under a generational curse due to Freemasonry. I was. I had to identify it to remove it.

You still didn't answer my question. What did I say that made you think I am a Mason?

Lees

 

[Manonfire63]

You already showed evidence of your guilt. By what you were espousing and your fruit.

How did the OP start? It was about understanding the Character of God. God did not change. (Malachi 3:6-7)

 

[Manonfire63]

You still didn't answer my question. What did I say that made you think I am a Mason?

Lees

I did.

Your fruit, what you are espousing, aligns with Freemasonry, very anti-Catholic. Looking to occult and put stumbling blocks before people.

 

[Lees]

You already showed evidence of your guilt. By what you were espousing and your fruit.

How did the OP start? It was about understanding the Character of God. God did not change. (Malachi 3:6-7)

In other words, there is nothing that I said that would make anyone believe I was a Mason. You simply made that accusation to either just discredit or perhaps someone else put you up to it.

If you want to prove me wrong, go back to post #(7) and show me what I said leads you to believe I am a Mason.

Lees

 

[Hadassah]

(Gen. 9:24-27) is not part of the Mosaic Covenant. And you misrepresent what I said. (Gen. 9:24-27) speaks to race as a whole. No doubt there are many saved of Ham. But Ham's descendants as a race are still under the curse and lack of blessing from Noah.

Well, you were found to be ignorant of Scripture, which I showed you. Anyone can make an error. But you refuse to acknowledge your error. Which makes you suspect...in my opinion.

Again, prove to me you're a woman.

Lees

Yet Moses penned it. That would mean the "Noahide Law" as you would call it, has supremacy over the Mosaic covenant? Yet Moses clearly, shows that he presents before the Israelites the laws of life and death. What you are saying and have been saying is, Jews are not subject to Noah's curse of his son and blacks are and no black is a Hebrew. You also say, Noah is supreme over Christ . Christ, who is the Law and the Prophets, in whom is the protection from all curses, generational, lineage etc....because nothing is cursed in Him. You speak against Christ! Anathema!

 

[Manonfire63]

Which Protestant Prophet are you following where you have authority? @Lees

Authority works in particular ways.

 

[Lees]

I did.

Your fruit, what you are espousing, aligns with Freemasonry, very anti-Catholic. Looking to occult and put stumbling blocks before people.

No, you didn't. And now you're crawfishing. Go back to my post #(7) and show me what I said leads you to believe I am a Mason.

Just because you said it, means nothing. I am asking you to show me. Just because I recognize what the Reformation was doesn't make me anti-Catholic.

Lees

 

[Lees]

Yet Moses penned it. That would mean the "Noahide Law" as you would call it, has supremacy over the Mosaic covenant? Yet Moses clearly, shows that he presents before the Israelites the laws of life and death. What you are saying and have been saying is, Jews are not subject to Noah's curse of his son and blacks are and no black is a Hebrew. You also say, Noah is supreme over Christ . Christ, who is the Law and the Prophets, in whom is the protection from all curses, generational, lineage etc....because nothing is cursed in Him. You speak against Christ! Anathema!

No. Supremacy is only in your thinking. Not mine. It's not a question of 'supreme'. It's just understanding what passed away and what didn't. The Mosaic law did. Noah's prophecy in (Gen. 9:24-27) did not.

I never said Noah is supreme over Christ. Again, that is you. I never said those in Christ are cursed. That is you.

I guess I can forget about you proving to me you're a woman.

Lees

 

[Manonfire63]

Some people in the Reformation were "Anti-Catholic" in a type of Hipster Christianity. It was hip to be "Not Catholic." In 2024, let us be right. Lets be right with God. Was the Catholic Church wrong at times? Possibly. Lets look to be right. Some people, they were "not Catholic" in a hipster Reformation Christianity, working to show their hipster friends how not Catholic they were.

That was what you were showing.

You keep refering back to post #7. Did you just ignore the posts before then in a way to dismiss them?

That smacks of Freemasonry.

 

[Lees]

Which Protestant Prophet are you following where you have authority? @Lees

Authority works in particular ways.

You continue to avoid the question based upon your accusation of what I said. Where in post #(7) did I say anything that made you think I was a Mason.

Don't ask me questions when you refuse to answer mine.

Lees

 

[Hadassah]

No. Just because one makes the accusation doesn't mean I have the burden to prove anything. The burden lies with the accuser. Which is why I asked, 'what did I write that made you think I am a Mason'?

And, since you entered into that accusation, then you need to show proof. In the meantime, show me proof you're a woman, as you claim.

Lees

The accuser is you! That's the point. As for proof I am a woman, Lol! no court of law during this woke generation would ask me to do that. Not even judges on the "supreme" court are required to define what a woman is like the days of Noah and (Sodom ) will it be when the Day of the Lord comes -as the Lord said. I don't need to lift up my skirt! Meaning, I do not deny the supremacy of the NC over the Mosaic covenant or over misinterpretations of Genesis verses by you, I have faith in who Christ, He is over all things old and fading, soon to disappear 🫥

 

[Lees]

Some people in the Reformation were "Anti-Catholic" in a type of Hipster Christianity. It was hip to be "Not Catholic." In 2024, let us be right. Lets be right with God. Was the Catholic Church wrong at times? Possibly. Lets look to be right. Some people, they were "not Catholic" in a hipster Reformation Christianity, working to show their hipster friends how not Catholic they were.

That was what you were showing.

You keep refering back to post #7. Did you just ignore the posts before then in a way to dismiss them?

That smacks of Freemasonry.

No, no. You specifically were addressing post #(7) when you made your accusation. I see why you don't reply to my specific posts now. You got burned with post (7). Crawfish.

Just because I referenced the Reformation doesn't make me anti-Catholic. Certainly doesn't make me a Mason.

Lees

 

[Manonfire63]

On the lighter side of things, one day, I found myself saying something like "I have the memory like an elephant, and I may be riding some Democrats all the way to Jerusalem."

I had no context for that comment. I just said or wrote it online one day.

Months later, I found:

 

[Manonfire63]

More or less, all the theology I have done, it has happened like that.

 

[Hadassah]

No. Supremacy is only in your thinking. Not mine. It's not a question of 'supreme'. It's just understanding what passed away and what didn't. The Mosaic law did. Noah's prophecy in (Gen. 9:24-27) did not.

I never said Noah is supreme over Christ. Again, that is you. I never said those in Christ are cursed. That is you.

I guess I can forget about you proving to me you're a woman.

Lees

Of course it is an issue of supremacy in my mind and Christ's for I have the mind of Christ and He says you challenge His supremacy. It is done! He is the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end! Noah answers to Him as does Moses. Who Christ sets free is free indeed!

Forget me proving I'm woman is right, you have yet to prove you are a man in Christ!

 

[Lees]

The accuser is you! That's the point. As for proof I am a woman, Lol! no court of law during this woke generation would ask me to do that. Not even judges on the "supreme" court are required to define what a woman is like the days of Noah and (Sodom ) will it be when the Day of the Lord comes -as the Lord said. I don't need to lift up my skirt! Meaning, I do not deny the supremacy of the NC over the Mosaic covenant or over misinterpretations of Genesis verses by you, I have faith in who Christ, He is over all things old and fading, soon to disappear 🫥

No, by what I said in post #(7) I was accused of being a Mason. The burden lies on the accuser to prove what I said made him think I was a Mason.

In other words, you can't prove you're a woman on a forum.

Lees

 

[Hadassah]

On the lighter side of things, one day, I found myself saying something like "I have the memory like an elephant, and I may be riding some Democrats all the way to Jerusalem."

I had no context for that comment. I just said or wrote it online one day.

Months later, I found:

 

[Hadassah]

No, by what I said in post #(7) I was accused of being a Mason. The burden lies on the accuser to prove what I said made him think I was a Mason.

In other words, you can't prove you're a woman on a forum.

Lees

Christians are to test all spirits according to 1 John 4. Sorry my man you need to present the goods