Rens
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2015
- Messages
- 4,754
- Age
- 54
- Gender
- Female
- Religious Affiliation
- Pentecostal
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
Dude, you aren't reading what I wrote. Yes, as a FORMER PHARISEE/CONVERT - Saul/Paul says, in Philippians 3:5-6, that his actions AS A PHARISEE/HEBREW OF HEBREW AND CONCERNING THE LAW - he is BLAMELESS.
In Saul/Paul's world - again - according to him - AS A CONVERT - he says he was BLAMELESS in taking out new Christians from the synagogues - meaning - they were worshiping on Sabbath with the Jews - singling them out - putting them in prison, agreeing to them being stoned, and compelling them to blaspheme.
That is what he says is his "zeal" - persecuting the believers - and by extension he says this is BLAMELESS regarding the "righteousness of the law". There is no law that allowed him to do what he was doing!
So from this verse alone I know he is a liar. The new Christians didn't have their own churches at the time. There is no mention they were doing anything that merited any of the actions Saul/Paul was taking upon them.
Yes, I realize that in the very verses following he says his actions here he "counts for loss". This is not "correcting himself" - it is rather a perfect example of his doublespeak. His actions of murder, imprisonment and compelling to blaspheme innocent people had 0 justification under the law, but he says they do by quoting the "righteousness of the law", then counts it for loss!
Saul/Paul's "blinding light" experience has 0 named witnesses. It's just his story. What's more, in each of the 3 accounts of it the details change. As for "missing out" - I know I am not. I grew up going to Christian churches reading and having read to me the words of Saul/Paul - so I am fairly familiar with them.
He mixes in truth with error - often.
I don't need any external authority to point out what is plainly written and represented as the Word of God penned by someone who claims to be his spokesman.
Here's one example that immediately comes to mind:
Proverbs 14:15 The simple believe anything, but the prudent give thought to their steps.
Yet Saul/Paul calls "believing anything" or "believing all things" an attribute of Love!
1 Corinthians 13:7 Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.
You have to read everything he wrote to understand what he's saying. He says confess and believe and you're saved, but he also says murderers won't inherit the Kingdom. It's also in Psalms: it shall happen that anyone who shall call on the Name of the Lord shall be saved. He says believeth all things and also warns for false teachers, so I don't take that as: believe just anything. He was happy with the Bereans who tested with the O.T. if what he preached was true.
It's a good thing what you said though. I had never thought about it like that. I was like: oh wow, look, he was blameless for the law, he didn't even keep the most important one.
http://www.bibleserralta.com/PaulBlameless.html
Last edited: