- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
- Messages
- 19,382
- Location
- Western Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Catholic
- Political Affiliation
- Moderate
- Marital Status
- Single
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
Josiah, it is gibberish whenever it is recorded and tested by language experts. For many people it seems that being a real language is not even up for consideration so they opt for "angelic" languages or "ecstatic speech" or simply "a prayer language" that corresponds to "unutterable groans" originating with the Spirit.
I have never encountered a person who "speaks in tongues" who was convincingly speaking any language but since that is not the claim any more I guess it doesn't matter. "Interpretation of tongues" appears to be indistinguishable from a "prophecy" or "a word of wisdom" or "a word of knowledge" yet all these verbal charismata are apparently "messages from God" according to those who speak them out loud in public meetings. And "speaking in tongues" in private is regarded as using a "prayer language" - I am guessing that this kind of "speaking in tongues" is not conveying messages from God to Christians in general.
I have never encountered a person who "speaks in tongues" who was convincingly speaking any language but since that is not the claim any more I guess it doesn't matter. "Interpretation of tongues" appears to be indistinguishable from a "prophecy" or "a word of wisdom" or "a word of knowledge" yet all these verbal charismata are apparently "messages from God" according to those who speak them out loud in public meetings. And "speaking in tongues" in private is regarded as using a "prayer language" - I am guessing that this kind of "speaking in tongues" is not conveying messages from God to Christians in general.
