One thing I find interesting is the stark contrast between an event like the healing in Acts 3 and many healings we hear about today.
In Acts 3 the man healed when Peter and John commanded him to get up and walk was someone everybody knew. They saw him, they knew him, they knew he was lame and now they could see him walking and leaping and dancing. It would have been very obvious to anyone that something very unusual had just happened.
Compare and contrast to today where we have bodies with very fancy sounding titles (often ending in Ministries or Outreach or some such) with very fine sounding stories of things that happened Somewhere Else, to Someone Else, but never seem to happen here. The ministries almost seem to be trying to validate themselves with some grand story of what happened at THEIR event in some far-flung corner of the world (which was maybe kinda-sorta-something to do with God but the focus is still primarily on the speaker), then some folks start demanding people accept it or explain what else it was, and all the time things don't happen here.
When presented with a story of what might have been a miraculous healing in Equatorial Guinea there's no way I can tell whether it was a genuine work of God, a well placed stooge, a total fabrication, an illusion, a demonic healing or something else. As such the only conclusion I can draw is "I don't know", which is often paired with "and I don't really care" because it makes precisely zero difference to my life or my faith just what actually happened. If the same healing happened in my church on a Sunday morning I'd have enough information to make a more informed judgment, even if the best I could do for now is appreciate that something very unusual actually took place.