Blood Moons

[visionary]

Well, ok then... Glad to see you all participate... Time will tell.. heads up are always worth checking out... Now we wait and see.

 

[Hammster]

so do I if for no other reason than to point out what is unbiased and what isnt

I'm biased. As is everyone.


Sent from my iPhone using my right thumb.

 

[Hammster]

Well, ok then... Glad to see you all participate... Time will tell.. heads up are always worth checking out... Now we wait and see.

And when you're wrong, will you repent or will you just go back and adjust?


Sent from my iPhone using my right thumb.

 

[visionary]

US Navy On High Alert As China And Russia To Launch Largest-Ever Joint War Games
THE CHINESE AND RUSSIAN NAVIES ARE GEARING UP FOR THEIR LARGEST EVER JOINT EXERCISES, SLATED TO BEGIN THURSDAY IN THE PACIFIC WITH MORE THAN 20 SHIPS FROM THE TWO NATIONS AND TO FEATURE ANTI-SUBMARINE OPERATIONS AS WELL AS A JOINT-BEACH LANDING.

 

[visionary]

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/...6dc4e53ae7826950fa1a2dbaef2213c5016fbfa9d6ab6

Suburbanization and industrial deforestation are decimating the world’s trees, and there are only 2 intact giant forests remaining on planet earth. However, across the globe, some other phenomenon is causing standing trees to wither and die in record numbers, and at present, the problem is receiving considerable mention in California, where millions of trees are dying during the worst drought the region has seen in perhaps some 1200 years.

 

[tango]

NASA: There is no asteroid threatening earth

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=4692

 

[GenesisGirl]

I am testing the link for Hammster

http://samstorms.com/enjoying-god-blog/post/four-blood-moons:-its-called-lunacy-for-a-reason

 

[visionary]

A large portion of CERN is located in the territory of Saint Genis Pouilly. In Roman times it was called Apolliacum. The name Pouilly comes from the Latin " Appolliacum ", with the Latin suffix "iacum" denoting possession. The town and a temple were dedicated to Apollyon - the destroyer (Shiva/Horus). * "...to him was given the key of the bottomless pit. And he opened the bottomless pit ...And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon." - Rev 9:1-2,11
- See more at: http://informedchristians.com/index...n-and-the-bible#sthash.7QK8zsLw.9chdZSNG.dpuf

 

[visionary]

CERN is celebrating "2015: the International Year of Light" "This year, which marks the centenary of the publication of Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity, has been named the International Year of Light and light-based technologies by the UN General Assembly. CERN is taking this opportunity to communicate about the High Luminosity LHC project and CERN’s involvement in the SESAME synchrotron laboratory in Jordan."- CERN. Note that their partner project is called Sesame, which echoes "Open Sesame", the magical phrase from Ali Baba to open a hidden doorway. - See more at: http://informedchristians.com/index...n-and-the-bible#sthash.7QK8zsLw.9chdZSNG.dpuf

 

[Hammster]

And when you're wrong, will you repent or will you just go back and adjust?


Sent from my iPhone using my right thumb.

Still waiting for an answer.


Sent from my iPhone using my right thumb.

 

[visionary]

I will go back and adjust because I know that prophecies for end days are true and will happen.. when, where, what, how and who are still the questions.

 

[Hammster]

I will go back and adjust because I know that prophecies for end days are true and will happen.. when, where, what, how and who are still the questions.

So you're just throwing stuff up against the wall and seeing what sticks.

At least you admit it


Sent from my iPhone using my right thumb.

 

[tango]

I will go back and adjust because I know that prophecies for end days are true and will happen.. when, where, what, how and who are still the questions.

Going back and adjusting sounds very much like making lots of predictions and then forgetting about the ones that you got wrong.

I used to do that with my stock trading account. It was nice to forget about the turkeys I backed and focus on the ones that went stratospheric, but the turkeys still had a nasty habit of soaking up cash however much I tried to forget about them. Isn't it better to say "I thought this would happen by November" and accept you were wrong, than to go back and change things so it looks like you never made the prediction? It seems a pretty good mark of a false prophet would be that they were quick to try and hide the evidence when they shot a blank.

 

[visionary]

Never said I was a prophet, just a studier.

 

[tango]

Never said I was a prophet, just a studier.

So why not accept that you drew a conclusion that turned out to be false? History is littered with things that were once known to be true and subsequently proven to be false. The earth being flat and the sun revolving around the earth are just two of those. Isn't it intellectually dishonest to draw a conclusion from study, come to realise the conclusion was false, and then attempt to hide the conclusion rather than posting the additional study that demonstrated why it was false? Even if the only "additional study" is the passing of time, isn't it more useful to have a discussion of "why Jesus didn't return in 1988" (to borrow one now discredited idea) than to "go back and adjust", that could so easily look like it was never predicted in the first place?

 

[visionary]

I am trying to connect the dots, not trying to declare dreams, visions, etc.

 

[visionary]

Time will tell.

 

[tango]

I am trying to connect the dots, not trying to declare dreams, visions, etc.

Sure, you said that already.

But isn't it still more intellectually honest to accept that you connected the dots in a way that turned out to be wrong, rather than going back and adjusting?

When you talked of going back and adjusting, if you meant you reassessed what you had concluded and wrote about what you got wrong and why while adding any new conclusions you had drawn then I misunderstood you, in which case I apologise for the needless rabbit trail. But if you talked of adjusting to look as if you hadn't made the false conclusion then it seems intellectually dishonest whether the conclusion was the result of secular study or dreams and visions, no?

 

[Hammster]

I am trying to connect the dots, not trying to declare dreams, visions, etc.

The problem is that you aren't looking at all of the dots. You pick the ones that fit the conclusion you've already drawn.


Sent from my iPhone using my right thumb.

 

[visionary]

Sure, you said that already.

But isn't it still more intellectually honest to accept that you connected the dots in a way that turned out to be wrong, rather than going back and adjusting?

When you talked of going back and adjusting, if you meant you reassessed what you had concluded and wrote about what you got wrong and why while adding any new conclusions you had drawn then I misunderstood you, in which case I apologise for the needless rabbit trail. But if you talked of adjusting to look as if you hadn't made the false conclusion then it seems intellectually dishonest whether the conclusion was the result of secular study or dreams and visions, no?

Normal assessments like that is done in life all the time. Trump went bankrupt but learned from his mistakes and went on to become a billionaire many times over. We learn from our mistakes, fine tune what we know and grow from the experience. There is nothing wrong with learning and relearning... it is part of the overcoming, transforming, renewing of the mind...