Search results

I am not absolutely Oneness and I do believe in three distinct Persons within the Godhead (therefore I believe that I believe in the Trinity). You can read my post in the "appropriate forum" which gives my take on the Trinity and see if it conforms with the Trinity well enough for you to count...

I did a search on google: "Christian Message Boards".

Thank you, brother.

I refrain from responding to you because I am tempted to exhibit what might be identified as trollish behaviour in response to what you are posting; answering your posts in kind. I desire to have a prolonged stay at this website so I am resisting that temptation at this point.

And again, you are disagreeing with holy scripture.

It does do something. It did something for me. It brought to me remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Ghost, as promised.

Ask and it shall be given to you. If you ask the Father to baptize you in Jesus' Name for the remission of sins, when you pour the water over your head, He will do it. I mean, you can try to make it harder for people to enter the kingdom by saying that you have to be baptized by a minister; or...

I will say that Luke 1:35 does in fact reveal to us that Jesus was begotten in the incarnation. Luk 1:35, And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee...

The scripture doesn't go against my sound logic. And it is also irrelevant to the fact that you have contradicted yourself. But I am going to bow out of this conversation; lest one of us be labeled as a troll.

You need to simply communicate your points more concisely. The problem is in your communication and not in my ability to understand.

What I mean is that the scriptures you quoted are irrelevant as concerning the fact that you have contradicted yourself. And those scriptures are not against me. We still have yet to determine what you mean when you say that Jesus was born of God at the resurrection. Are you saying that He...

Not really. Try again.

It doesn't matter. Those scriptures do not change the fact that you have contradicted yourself.

You contradicted yourself in post #40; and also gave no explanation. And you still have not defined begotten. Was Jesus God before His resurrection in your view? If so, what does it mean that He was "begotten"? "born of" God at the resurrection? In what manner was Jesus born of God at the...

Nope.

By itself, you would be correct. However, with prayer, there is a promise in Ezekiel 36:25-27 wherein we are promised that when God sprinkles clean water on us, He will cleanse us from all our filthiness and all our idols, will give us a new heart and a new spirit, will take the stony heart out...

Nope. Because there is no error in my thinking. But your error will be seen all day. I have not contradicted myself; but you have contradicted yourself.

You still haven't answered the question. What does "begotten" mean to you? Also, you have contradicted yourself. For you say that the Son was never begotten, and then you say that the Son, 2nd Person of the Trinity, was begotten.

So, He wasn't God until the resurrection? What does it mean to you that He was "begotten" of the Father at the resurrection?

Then logic means nothing to you. Want to go again? I can do this all day.