Search results

  1. Origen

    JOHN 7:1 JESUS HAD BROTHERS

    Not at all. I am simply uninterested.
  2. Origen

    JOHN 7:1 JESUS HAD BROTHERS

    You need not wonder or worry about me one way or the other.
  3. Origen

    JOHN 7:1 JESUS HAD BROTHERS

    I just did. You never said "mid." You gave the date 110 and used the words "before 200." That means mean it could have been written, according to you, anytime between 110 and 199. That is not mid-century. A mid-century would be ca. 150 not sometime between 110 and 199.
  4. Origen

    JOHN 7:1 JESUS HAD BROTHERS

    You said and I quote: "Some date it to 110 (earliest), some to "before 200" (latest)." You said nothing about "Mid-Second Century" date in post 246. I never said you did. Again, I never said you did. I merely pointed out I find no reason to follow a pseudepigrapha document when it comes to...
  5. Origen

    JOHN 7:1 JESUS HAD BROTHERS

    That is a very optimistic date to say the least (i.e. 110). The scholarly consensus does not really support that date. A more reasonable date is the mid-second century. Nevertheless, I find no reason to follow a pseudepigrapha document when it comes to doctrine. But to each his own.
  6. Origen

    JOHN 7:1 JESUS HAD BROTHERS

    Please, what is the name of the source that dates back to A.D. 110?
  7. Origen

    JOHN 7:1 JESUS HAD BROTHERS

    Not interested
  8. Origen

    JOHN 7:1 JESUS HAD BROTHERS

    That has nothing to do with the OP. I have no interest in taking this thread even further off topic.
  9. Origen

    JOHN 7:1 JESUS HAD BROTHERS

    Why are you asking me?
  10. Origen

    Hey!

    Hello and welcome
  11. Origen

    Did the very first Christians have the apocrypha in their Bible?

    Again, that does nothing to explain how בְּרֵאשִׁית has anything to do with direct object marker in Gen. 1:1 or any other passage in the Old Testament. The Hebrew language has rules of grammar. Explain how that idea matters in regard to the grammar and syntax of a passage.
  12. Origen

    Did the very first Christians have the apocrypha in their Bible?

    The cow jumped over the moon.
  13. Origen

    Did the very first Christians have the apocrypha in their Bible?

    That does nothing to explain how בְּרֵאשִׁית has anything to do with direct object marker in Gen. 1:1 or any other passage in the Old Testament.
  14. Origen

    Did the very first Christians have the apocrypha in their Bible?

    Well then explain how the phrase בְּרֵאשִׁית is an essential element for understanding the direct object marker's use in Hebrew grammar and syntax?
  15. Origen

    Did the very first Christians have the apocrypha in their Bible?

    It is left out because it is not necessary. That section is about the use of אֵת (i.e. the direct object maker). Lexicons are not going to waste space. Moreover the sentence still make perfect sense without it (i.e. God created the heavens and the earth).
  16. Origen

    Did the very first Christians have the apocrypha in their Bible?

    What I gave is from the Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, Vol. 1 pp. 439 and 449. The rest comes under the bet resh alef.
  17. Origen

    Did the very first Christians have the apocrypha in their Bible?

    The Hebrew is being read from right to left.
  18. Origen

    Did the very first Christians have the apocrypha in their Bible?

    Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, Vol. 1 pp. 439 and 449
Top Bottom