Search results

No, ALL OF THEM pre-date Jerome's list.

Hardly! All of them pre-date Jerome's canon list. Jerome gave his list ca. A.D. 391.

That is simply not true. The canon lists I provided prove your claim is not correct.

No need to do so. I have not made any claims, therefore I have nothing to defend. Nothing to pretend. There is simply no need to present any other view on the topic since you have zero primary sources\objective evidence for your claims. As I point outed in post 281: If it makes you happy...

You simply want to divert attention away from yourself and the FACT you have no primary sources\objective evidence for your claims. I am on topic. The problem is you made claims which you cannot support and now cannot stand being held accountable for them.

Since I made no claims there is nothing for me to defend. You, are the other hand, did in fact make certain claims and then was asked to provide primary sources\objective evidence for your claims. You could not then. and you cannot now. If, however, it makes you happy you may assume for the...

Again, that you cannot provide primary sources\objective evidence for your claims. That is what I claim.

You cannot provide primary sources\objective evidence for your claims.

They were just men just like Melito, Cyril of Jerusalem, Athanasius of Alexandria, Gregory of Nazianzus. Amphilochius of Iconium, Epiphanius of Salamis, and Jerome and you have given no objective reason to think those men knew anymore than these men. And even after those councils many still did...

I am proving exactly just what I set out to prove. You cannot provide primary sources\objective evidence for your claims.

The rest of the chapter, just like you, cannot answer my question. You said EVERYTHING else n Hebrews 11 is from the Bible. "They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were killed with the sword." Cite the passage for the section in bold. Check the 1611 KVJ maybe there is a note.

Where exactly did the Councils of Rome, Hippo, and Carthage state Melito, Cyril of Jerusalem, Athanasius of Alexandria, Gregory of Nazianzus. Amphilochius of Iconium, Epiphanius of Salamis, and Jerome are all wrong because they followed the unbelieving Jews?

Sure, sure! Anyone who does not agree with your view is siding with the unbelieving Jews. That is nothing more than your attempt to discredit those who do not agree with you. In order to accept your view one would have to believe that all those men (i.e. Melito, Cyril of Jerusalem, Athanasius...

And you still have no answer. There is a simple way to solve the problem. You stated: You said EVERYTHING else n Hebrews 11 is from the Bible. "They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were killed with the sword." Cite the passage for the section in bold.

Never said it could. How does that prove\support your claims?

I never suggested anything like that. That view has as much evidence to support it as the one you have presented thus far. Thanks for your opinion but I find no reason to accept it.

That is wrong. We have no manuscripts of the LXX dating before Nicaea that have the books of Maccabees. The ones we do have date to the 4th century and even those do not agree with each other. Care to try again?

Try reading. The Bryennios List dates to 2nd century A.D. Melito's list is dated to A.D. 170. Origen's list dates between A.D. 220-240. Now provide a canon list from before Nicaea which includes the books of Maccabees.

Clearly you have no idea what the words Ante-Nicene means. The word "ante" means before so "ante nicene" mean "before nicene." The council of Nicaea was held in 325.

All of the following provide canon lists and all leave out the books of the Maccabees. Melito Cyril of Jerusalem Athanasius of Alexandria Gregory of Nazianzus Amphilochius of Iconium Epiphanius of Salamis Jerome https://christianityhaven.com/threads/o-t-canon-lists.10083/ And these are not the...