Search results

Yes he did very clearly. "you are all sons of God" "There is neither Jew nor Greek" "you are all are one in Christ Jesus" "you are Abraham’s offspring"

None of that changes the fact of what Paul clearly stated and what it means for your view. "But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian, for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith." (Gal 3:25-26) "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor...

He claims to know so much about Paul's thinking yet conveniently overlooks anything which refuted his view. "But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian, for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith." (Gal 3:25-26) "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is...

Hello and welcome

What good would it do anyway? I doubt it would change anything at all.

GREAT POINT @Lämmchen What's that you say Paul? "Know then that it is those of faith who are the sons of Abraham." (Gal. 3:7) "But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian, for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith. (Gal 3:25-26) "There is neither Jew nor...

In its original context Oholah is Samaria (nothern kingdom), and Oholibah is Jerusalem (southern kindgom). Thus the two daughters represented the period of the divided kingdoms. Both Oholah and Oholibah are derived from the Hebrew verb אהל "to pitch tent" (the noun form is אֹהֶל = tent)...

Nothing vulgar about it. The word of the LORD came to me: “Son of man, there were two women, the daughters of one mother. They played the whore in Egypt; they played the whore in their youth; there their breasts were pressed and their virgin bosoms handled. Oholah was the name of the elder and...

Could you repeat that OITW? :rolleyes:

What did you say?

Sound a lot like

Hello and welcome

a poisonous snake

No doubt. “So they tore down the altar, and stored the stones in a convenient place on the temple hill until there should come a prophet to tell what to do with them.” (1 Maccabees 4:46). “Thus there was great distress in Israel, such as had not been since the time that prophets ceased to...

Again I made it. “So they tore down the altar, and stored the stones in a convenient place on the temple hill until there should come a prophet to tell what to do with them.” (1 Maccabees 4:46). “Thus there was great distress in Israel, such as had not been since the time that prophets ceased...

I made it. “So they tore down the altar, and stored the stones in a convenient place on the temple hill until there should come a prophet to tell what to do with them.” (1 Maccabees 4:46). “Thus there was great distress in Israel, such as had not been since the time that prophets ceased to...

Another exaggerated and misleading comment made by you. Neither Athananius nor I said anything like that. They had their view and Athananius had his. No one condemned Athananius for his view, not Rome, Hippo or Carthage.

No I don't. It could not be more clear. The author meant what he said. “So they tore down the altar, and stored the stones in a convenient place on the temple hill until there should come a prophet to tell what to do with them.” (1 Maccabees 4:46). “Thus there was great distress in Israel...

Exactly! And others said the same long before Luther. Athanasius, for example, make a very clear distinction between canonical and non-canonical books. He states: "But for the sake of greater exactness I add this also, writing under obligation, as it were. There are other books besides...