Search results

Yes, but the point is that Martin took the books out of the main body of text in the Old Testament and put them in their own section in between the Testaments. Nobody had done this before. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

“I counsel you to buy from Me gold refined in the fire, that you may be rich; and white garments, that you may be clothed, that the shame of your nakedness may not be revealed; and anoint your eyes with eye salve, that you may see.” -Revelation 3:18...

That’s very stereotypical. “Demons are red and aliens are green.” Don’t you know not to judge a person by the color of their skin? Besides, aliens are grey, not green. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yea, there’s no life on other planets. That’s why I think they’re demons. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You’re asking a question which door we would choose Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You don’t need to study the raw of Israel to understand the eye of a needle. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, I agree. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks. Yea, that sounds about right. I’m not sure if anyone did that before he did. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We already told you when the early church declared those books to be scripture, but you refused to listen. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Interesting. I didn’t know that. I knew it was originally written in Hebrew, but didn’t know it wasn’t called Maccabees. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I was talking about the Protestants in the 1500’s who removed books from the Old Testament. But I think you knew that already and are purposely play acting like you didn’t know any better. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wasn’t asking about the modern Hebrew text. I was asking about Christian Bibles. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sounds to me like you’re questioning the New Testament books too. You’re not going to find an ecumenical council that lists the New Testament books. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not true. The New Testament cites books like 2 Maccabees which has no Hebrew original. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Those “obscure” meetings are what bible scholars point to today to prove what books belong in the New Testament. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Good point. The Bible often refers to people by more than one name. Like Jethro first being introduced as Raul. Jehoahaz also being known as Shallum. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Psalm 34 says it was Abimelech who David pretended madness before: But 1 Samuel 21 says it was Achish: Which one was it? How do we solve this contradiction? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That’s right. Not all scripture is written by prophets. Some scripture is written by high priests. Simon Maccabee was a high priest. Hmmmmm… Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You read Judith? Cool. Did you like it? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where’s the ecumenical church council where all Christians declared those books to not be scripture? Do you have the authority to make this decision for all of Christianity? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk