Search results

“I never made any claims” “I never made any claims” “I never made any claims” Bye! Go do your research now. Get back to us after you’ve proven David Bercot wrong. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sounds about right. Just say “I never made any claims” and back yourself out of any responsibility. It’s always the other guy’s responsibility. Origen needs to listen to David Bercot’s teaching. WE HAVE listened to it. HE HASN’T. Who’s the one being lazy here? I’d love to hear someone refute...

I think you misunderstood me. I was saying “BYE” in the sense get Origen needs to leave and go do his research. I wasn’t saying I was leaving. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hebrews 11:35 is a primary source. The author of Hebrews referenced 2 Maccabees 7 as scripture. Anyone who has read 2 Maccabees 7 should be able to see this as clear as say. That’s a primary source. So stop it with “You have no primary sources.” Uh, the BIBLE is a primary source!! Sent from my...

Show me a PRIMARY source that there was a BC canon list! Oh, wait, there isn’t one. Hmmmm…looks like Origen and Josiah have no primary sources. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Clement’s letter to the Corinthians is also a primary source. So, if that’s not primary enough for you, then you really need to get off of here and go do research on your own. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The entire volume of ante-nicene fathers doesn’t count? Who died and put you in charge? The early church fathers is HUGE evidence. And again, how is Daniel 8 not a primary source? I suggest you listen to what David Bercot says. If you don’t listen to his teaching, then I’ll be convinced that...

You have the responsibility to do your own research. Go listen to David Bercot’s teaching and prove him wrong. Bye. Let us know what you find. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What are your claims? Have you read the whole volume of Ante-Nicene fathers like David Bercot has? Can you disprove him? Why are it wasting time on here? Go call him up. Go listen to his teaching. Prove him wrong. Get off of here and do your homework. Stop expecting me and Andrew to do all your...

By the way, how is Daniel 8 not a primary source? This chapter clearly prophesies about events that take place in Maccabees. And yet you’re saying Maccabees doesn’t belong in the Bible? Sorry, but that doesn’t make sense to me. It makes sense to me that Maccabees belongs in the Bible. And if...

You are the one who is hiding and not being accountable or responsible. When I ask you to prove to me that the apocrypha doesn’t belong in the Bible, you just hide behind the statement “I never made that claim,” or “ I’m not making any claims.” That’s called hiding. You refuse to share what...

YOU have a brain. YOU have the ability to do research. And I’m not going to spoon feed you. I have NOT read the entire volume of ante-nicene fathers. David Bercot has. And he has shared his insights of what he learned from them. I find a lot of what he says to be convincing, and that the...

I’ll give you the links to David Bercot’s teaching on the Apocrypha. You can ask him for his primary sources, and then get back to us on what he got wrong. “The Apocrypha: Separating Myth from Fact” by David Bercot. Part 1: Part 2:

What two calendars? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What about Clement? Have you read his letter to the Corinthians? Also, have you listened to David Bercot’s audio teaching on the Apocrypha? He shares tons of evidence. So just because you get on here and say “there’s no evidence” -that doesn’t convince me. All it tells me is that you’re not...

But public schools in America started out teaching the Bible with teacher-led prayer at the beginning. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You love the Septuagint? Then why are you so bent against the extra books it contains? Good grief. The impression I get from you is that your goal is to prove that these books do not belong in the Bible, and that they’ve been added by Christians long after the time of the disciples. But the...

This prophecy differs from BOTH the Masoretic and Septuagint readings, so what’s your point? The general message is still the same in the LXX and Masoretic, that there will be a ruler coming out of Bethlehem in Judah. Why even bring this verse up? ‘But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, Are...

You showed one single verse in Matthew and Micah. And you didn’t even post them on English. You put them in Greek so that we can’t even read them. What about the hundreds more of verses where the LXX is clearly being followed? Like Galatians 3:17, which clearly indicates 430 years in Egypt AND...

Congratulations. You found a scripture verse in the NT that sides with the Masoretic. So what? Even experts have concluded that the New Testament sides with the Masoretic text 10% of the time! That’s no surprise! But the NT sides with the LXX about 80% to 90% of the time. That’s a much bigger...