- Joined
- Jun 10, 2015
- Messages
- 33,202
- Age
- 58
- Gender
- Female
- Religious Affiliation
- Lutheran
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
Noah survived the experience while the others did not. My concern is that if we try and use Noah to argue that the non-believers will be whisked away and the believers left behind on the earth we potentially force an application into the text that it just doesn't support. The description of the woes and the judgments in Revelation make it clear that they affect those who took the mark of the beast, which means that non-believers must be on earth for that stage at least. It could be argued that the wrath is poured out upon those who believers who broke under pressure and took the mark of the beast but I'd suspect if the only people left on the earth were true believers they would support each other to reduce the likelihood of anyone taking the mark. If true believers are a minority (and a shrinking minority at that) it becomes more likely that they would be flushed out by the agents of the beast and presented with the choice to take the mark or die right there and then.
Also, the fact God chose to work in one particular way where Noah was concerned doesn't obligate him to do the same thing the next time his wrath is poured out upon the earth.
Scripture brings up the point about Noah and the ark when referring to Christ's return which refutes the "Left Behind" crowd where believers are whisked away since Noah wasn't whisked anywhere else but was left. I hold to the Amillennial belief.