Justification: By OUR works or CHRIST'S works?

psalms 91

Well-known member
Moderator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
15,283
Age
75
Location
Pa
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Charismatic
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
I find some things within the Catholic church to be deceptive but they will tell you you misunderstand and thatisnt what it really means
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,200
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I find some things within the Catholic church to be deceptive but they will tell you you misunderstand and that isn't what it really means

Chances are that you might be misunderstanding what the Catholic Church teaches. I read your posts rather carefully and several times you've expressed ideas about Catholic teaching that are incorrect. If you wrote what you think on those matters then you have not understood what the Church teaches. I do not know if that is because you do not know what the Church teaches and are relying on sources that are not Catholic or if it is because you really did not understand what you've heard/read in official Catholic Church teaching. But sometimes it seems you've relied on what somebody said and that is always a little unsafe because people say all sorts of things that upon reflection they do not really mean or that are reflections of their own poorly researched views.
 

psalms 91

Well-known member
Moderator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
15,283
Age
75
Location
Pa
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Charismatic
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Chances are that you might be misunderstanding what the Catholic Church teaches. I read your posts rather carefully and several times you've expressed ideas about Catholic teaching that are incorrect. If you wrote what you think on those matters then you have not understood what the Church teaches. I do not know if that is because you do not know what the Church teaches and are relying on sources that are not Catholic or if it is because you really did not understand what you've heard/read in official Catholic Church teaching. But sometimes it seems you've relied on what somebody said and that is always a little unsafe because people say all sorts of things that upon reflection they do not really mean or that are reflections of their own poorly researched views.
True but as with the word Catholic, it means universsal but I find that protestants are viewed as outcasts and not true christians. Do you disagree with that assessment? If I was at a dinner or other informal setting with catholics how would they describe protestants?
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,200
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
True but as with the word Catholic, it means universal but I find that protestants are viewed as outcasts and not true christians.

The Catholic Church teaches that Protestants are brethren in Christ.

Do you disagree with that assessment?

Yes, I disagree with it because it is not what the Catholic Church teaches.

If I was at a dinner or other informal setting with catholics how would they describe protestants?

As brethren, perhaps as separated brethren.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
True but as with the word Catholic, it means universsal

You are being deceptive, my friend. Actually, the word "Catholic" (a proper noun, a legal moniker) refers to a specific geopolitical, legal institution - one with its HQ in Rome. True, the adjective "catholic" means universal, whole, all-inclusive (that is the original and for many centuries only meaning and use) and so I'd fully agree with you that being a believer, you are "catholic" with the whole corpus of believers (past and present, across the centuries and continents): I too believe and confess that the church is one, holy, catholic communion of saints.

My point (which you have both renounced and agreed with) is that when you posted about Catholics (those officially registered in a congregation owned and operated by denomination with the legal moniker of The Catholic Church) believing we are saved by grace, I simply noted that this would likely be misunderstood by your readers, because with Catholics mention "grace" they don't mean what Protestants do, what the majority of readers here at CH do, they mean essentially the antithesis of that. (You later agreed with me there, and also blasted me for saying it). What you MEANT is to agree with my description of the Catholic view (that of your denomination), grace in Catholicism meaning what you later agreed with me that it does. Pretty much the antithesis of what non-Catholics mean by the word. Thus, your original post on that leads to a complete misunderstanding of Catholicism. Now, you CLAIM to be innocent here (a claim I'll let be), and that's fine - I never posted that you INTENDED to mislead, only that you did.

Here's what our Catholic teachers taught us: "God helps those who help themselves." "Christ opened the gate to heaven but you must get yourself through it by what you do." "Grace is like the 'gas' God puts in our 'tank' so that YOU can get YOURSELF where YOU need to be." It's Jesus as the possibility-maker perhaps...... maybe even Jesus as the HELPER .... but the Savior remains the one you see in the mirror. Ultimately, WE achieve it. Now, as I stated, INFORMED Catholics (especially when conversing with Protestants) are quick to add that we cannot do this by our own nature or strength but God HELPS us, empowers us (a point Jews, Muslims and some Hindus stress, as well). But oddly, it's not a point you've made. But either way, it's ultimately self looking in the mirror at self, self deserving, earning, "getting yourself through the gate by what YOU do." And again, this is the result of Catholicism making such a royal MESS of things, confusing man and God, confusing law and Gospel, confusing sanctification and justification....


Now.... to add..... I'm not SURE taht OFFICIALLY, FORMALLY Catholicism has this all wrong. I don 't think anyone knows; on the one topic Christians should be MOST clear on, this is the one Catholicism is most confused about. It seems to have entangled itself into such a blended, confused MESS that even Catholicism cannot determine what Catholicism believes or teaches about this. NONETHELESS, if one patiently shifts through official statements, among the MESS, one CAN fine the Gospel - and in my passionate view, CatholicS often find it (to the credit of God..... in spite of the MESS they are taught by that denomination). But what I KNOW is what we were taught.... you can argue that our pastor, our deacon and all our teachers taught us WRONGLY (and I would not challenge that, I honestly think a lot of that goes on in Catholicism - Catholicism being SO confusing, SO mixed up that it may be NONE actually knows WHAT it really teaches). But the reality remains: I was got we get ourselves to heaven - with HELP. What help? Well.... the Roman Catholic Denomination, the CURRENT list of officially approved "saints" of The Roman Catholic Church, the Treasury of Merits of The Roman Catholic Church, the EXACTLY Seven Sacraments that are owned and doled out by The Roman Catholic Church, and of course by the Blessed Mother who intercedes for us - they HELP us in this long, long process of saving ourselves. You may disagree with that view..... you may affirm that view.... but THAT'S what we were taught. And virtually every Catholic known to me (including LOTS of family members) affirm THAT'S what they were taught too.





.

.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The Catholic Church teaches that Protestants are brethren in Christ.


No. It teaches we are SEPARATED brethren..... The impression is always of half-breads looking in from the outside.

And of course, while your former pope literally kissed the Koran, we have nothing like that toward the Augsburg Confession or Westminster Confession...... Revealing.....

Although I fail to see what that has to do with what Catholics are taught about justification. You've already admitted Catholic have a view of grace that is the antithesis of non-Catholics.






Back to the topic.....




.
 

Alithis

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
2,680
Location
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
There is sin even if we don't know. If you are not PERFECT just as God is then you are a sinner (Matthew 5:48). Whether you know it or not. If you are not holy exactly as God is then you are a sinner. Whether you know it or not. If you do not love all people in the same way and to the same extent that Jesus loved on the Cross then you are a sinner. Whether you know it or not. Of course (quite understandably), the Bible insists that ALL are sinners.

I fundamentally disagree with your soteriology that we are the savior of ourselves by becoming perfect, holy, all-loving and that Scripture is wrong when it insists that Christians are sinners (and thus NOT what God requires). We are not justifed by our perfect obedience (thus rendering Jesus a joke), we are justified by GOD - via His MERCY, unconditional love, forgiveness..... by CHRIST, by the Blood, by the Cross. Not by self being perfect, holy, all-loving making self the Savior of Self and Jesus a joke. "Everyone sins" (First John 3:4), "There is no one that does good, not even one" (Romans 3:12). "All have sinned" (Romans 3:23). Thus, if you chose Option B (looking in the mirror rather than the Cross, appointing SELF the Savior rather than Jesus) then what you see and rely upon is a sinner. Not a Savior. "By works shall no one be justified" (Galatians 2:16), "If justification were through our keeping the law then Christ died for no purpose" (Galatians 2:21). "No one will be justified in God's sight by works (Romans 3:20). Rather, in stead of that, in sharp contrast with that, Scripture says: "Being found IN CHRIST, not having a righteousness of my own" (Philippians 3:9). "Christ saved us not because of deeds done by us but rather because of His own mercy" (Titus 3:5).




Thank you.


Pax



- Josiah

so misses the point of salvation .
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,200
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
No. It teaches we are SEPARATED brethren..... The impression is always of half-breads looking in from the outside.

And of course, while your former pope literally kissed the Koran, we have nothing like that toward the Augsburg Confession or Westminster Confession...... Revealing.....

Although I fail to see what that has to do with what Catholics are taught about justification. You've already admitted Catholic have a view of grace that is the antithesis of non-Catholics.

Back to the topic.....

The impression is of divisions that arose and separated brothers and sisters one from another. The CCC puts it this way.

attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php


Notice especially paragraph 818
 

Attachments

  • CCC - Wounds to Unity.jpg
    CCC - Wounds to Unity.jpg
    95.1 KB · Views: 9
  • CCC - Towards Unity.jpg
    CCC - Towards Unity.jpg
    85.9 KB · Views: 9
  • CCC - Towards Unity b.jpg
    CCC - Towards Unity b.jpg
    97.4 KB · Views: 9

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
More Coffee said:
Josiah said:
More Coffee said:
The Catholic Church teaches that Protestants are brethern.


.

No. It teaches we are SEPARATED brethren..... The impression is always of half-breads looking in from the outside.

And of course, while your former pope literally kissed the Koran, we have nothing like that toward the Augsburg Confession or Westminster Confession...... Revealing.....


The impression is of divisions that arose and separated brothers and sisters one from another.


Thanks for affirming that you were wrong in your characterization of the RC denomination's position.



Thanks for confirming all my points....
Yes, the RCC defines "grace" as essential divine HELP - necessary so that self can save self.
Yes, the RCC's understanding of "justification" is shockingly Christless, Crossless, Bloodless, merciless.
Yes, the Catholic Church is a denomination that is entirely absorbed with it itself and confuses "church" with denomination (but only in the sole, singular, exclusive, unique case of it itself alone).
Yes, Christians who are not docilic, official, formal members of a parish owned and operated by a single denomination - The Catholic Church - are regarded as lesser, separated, apart.
All points I made earlier.



Easter blessings to you and yours.


- Josiah




.
 
Last edited:

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,200
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Thanks for affirming that you were wrong in your characterization of the RC denomination's position.
Thanks for confirming all my points....
Yes, the RCC defines "grace" as essential divine HELP - necessary so that self can save self.
Yes, the RCC's understanding of "justification" is shockingly Christless, Crossless, Bloodless, merciless.
Yes, the Catholic Church is a denomination that is entirely absorbed with it itself and confuses "church" with denomination (but only in the sole, singular, exclusive, unique case of it itself alone).
Yes, Christians who are not docilic, official, formal members of a parish owned and operated by a single denomination - The Catholic Church - are regarded as lesser, separated, apart.
All points I made earlier.
Easter blessings to you and yours.
- Josiah

You have a terrifying talent for missing the obvious and leaping to bad conclusions.
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,200
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The Catholic Church teaches these things about Grace and Justification.

attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • CCC Grace and Justification.jpg
    CCC Grace and Justification.jpg
    79.9 KB · Views: 11
  • CCC Grace and Justification b.jpg
    CCC Grace and Justification b.jpg
    77.3 KB · Views: 11
  • CCC Grace and Justification c.jpg
    CCC Grace and Justification c.jpg
    77.6 KB · Views: 11

psalms 91

Well-known member
Moderator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
15,283
Age
75
Location
Pa
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Charismatic
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
one of the most obvious is that this church did not excist in the first century or even the second
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,200
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
one of the most obvious is that this church did not exist in the first century or even the second

The holy scriptures say otherwise. One of the most loved books in the new testament is saint Paul's letter to the Romans.
 

psalms 91

Well-known member
Moderator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
15,283
Age
75
Location
Pa
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Charismatic
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Romans yes, Catholic, no
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,200
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Romans yes, Catholic, no

Catholic is Christian, in the late first century it was already a common name for the Church to distinguish it from the many divisive and heretical sects that claimed to be Christian. It is not unlike today with so many groups claiming to be Christian when their doctrine and practises make it abundantly clear that they cannot be.
 

psalms 91

Well-known member
Moderator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
15,283
Age
75
Location
Pa
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Charismatic
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
A nice transition but the fact remains that you cannot interchange the meanings of Catholic, either it is all inclusive or else it is the church and the Catholic church as you are talking about didnt exist in the first centruy
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The holy scriptures say otherwise. One of the most loved books in the new testament is saint Paul's letter to the Romans.

Yes, it was written to PEOPLE (not any denomination), and never once mentions ANY denomination, never mentions any "POPE" of some denomination, and never refers to ANY denomination by the legal moniker of "The Catholic Church." But of course, the RC Denomination is OBSESSED with it itself, and "sees" it itself (invisible but nonetheless "seen") everywhere.


But whether or not CHRISTIANS lived in various placed in the First Century (including the City of Rome) has NOTHING to do with denominations, nothing to do with any singular, individual denomination that eventually will have the legal moniker of "The Catholic Church" in many countries and be incorporated under that name in those countries. And has NOTHING to do with those Christians saving themselves by their own works and merits (empowered by God or otherwise).




.
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,200
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Catholic is Christian, in the late first century it was already a common name for the Church to distinguish it from the many divisive and heretical sects that claimed to be Christian. It is not unlike today with so many groups claiming to be Christian when their doctrine and practises make it abundantly clear that they cannot be.

A nice transition but the fact remains that you cannot interchange the meanings of Catholic, either it is all inclusive or else it is the church and the Catholic church as you are talking about didn't exist in the first centruy

No one needs to "interchange the meanings" the Catholic Church truly is one, holy, catholic, and apostolic as the creed says that she is.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
No one needs to "interchange the meanings" the Catholic Church truly is one, holy, catholic, and apostolic as the creed says that she is.

No. That specific individual denomination is not "holy" (no denomination CAN be "holy"), sure it's 'one' but only with it itself alone (exclusively, solely, uniquely, only) - "one" with ITSELF in no way other than the LDS is "one" with ITSELF but hardly "one" and the same as all 2.2 billion Christian PEOPLE (not mentioning the billions of Christians who are now in heaven), and surely that individual denomination is not "catholic" since even by it's own WILD claims of self for self, about half of Christians are not docilic, official, formal members of any of its own and operated parishes (and even then, the members aren't the demonination, they are at most docilic, obedient, submissive MEMBERS of it).

The RCC is a denomination. Just as thousands of other denominations. You can argue that it's really old (you may claim the OLDEST - a point I'll wave since it's entirely, completely irrelevant, although I believe the oldest denomination is likely the Syrian Orthodox Church but who cares?) ... and it certainly is the largest (a point no one argues against) but again, who cares? It couldn't matter less. But it is what it is: the geopolitical, legal, economic institutional entity of millions of owned and operated parishes.

Again, "Catholic" ( a legal, proper NOUN, moniker of a denomination under which the denomination is incorporated in most legal jurisdictions) refers to a denomination. The word "catholic" (an adjective in common use in ancient times) means whole or universal or all-embracing and refers typically to PEOPLE - not to individual, singular, unique geopolitical, legal, economic institutional entities. Yes, the Creed is right: the church is US, the church is one, is holy, is catholic, is the communion of saints. The church is CHRISTIANS. Of course, your denomination is SO, SO completely obsessed with it itself uniquely, with the POWER QUEST that it itself has, with its all-embracing passion to be Lord over all and to lord it over all as the gentiles do, that it just sees it self everywhere - the the clouds, in its dreams, and most of all as it looks at itself in a pool of water.

the ancient creed says "catholic." LITTLE "c." Adjective. It's the enormous, jupiter-sized, power-hungry EGO of the individual, singular RC Denomination that has the gull to delete the word of the Creed (if not literally, than by reintepretation) to eliminate the adjective "catholic" and replace it with a key part of the legal moniker of it itself, "Catholic."




.
 

Alithis

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
2,680
Location
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Romans yes, Catholic, no

1 This letter is from Paul, a slave of Christ Jesus, chosen by God to be an apostle and sent out to preach his Good News. 2 God promised this Good News long ago through his prophets in the holy Scriptures. 3 The Good News is about his Son. In his earthly life he was born into King David’s family line, 4 and he was shown to be[a] the Son of God when he was raised from the dead by the power of the Holy Spirit. He is Jesus Christ our Lord. 5 Through Christ, God has given us the privilege
and authority as apostles to tell Gentiles everywhere what God has done for them, so that they will believe and obey him, bringing glory to his name.

6 And you are included among those Gentiles who have been called to belong to Jesus Christ. 7 I am writing to all of you in Rome who are loved by God and are called to be his own holy people.

May God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ give you grace and peace.


so your right .it is addressed to all those living in roma who are called to be holy people.. which include ANYONE who is a disciple of the lord Jesus that happened to be living in rome it is NOT a letter to ROME but to deciples of the Lord JEsus living there and he includes "gentiles everywhere " showing that there is no special distinction to rome.

there was no institutionalized state church until hundreds of years later .
 
Top Bottom