Stravinsk
Composer and Artist on Flat Earth
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2016
- Messages
- 4,562
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Deist
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Widow/Widower
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- No
The holy scriptures call it "old covenant". Here's an example: "But their minds were hardened; for to this day, when they read the old covenant, that same veil remains unlifted, because only through Christ is it taken away." (2 Corinthians 3:14)
Writing of Saul/Paul, the deceiver and false prophet, who had 0 named witnesses to his "blinding light conversion", quotes Dionysus from Bacchae in his telling of the event and who's conversion story contradicts itself in it's 3 versions.
The holy scriptures call the old covenant abolished. I showed that before in this verse: "He has abolished the law with its commandments and ordinances, so that he might create in himself one new humanity in place of the two, thus making peace," (Ephesians 2:15)
Quote from Saul/Paul - who's name means "Asked for", "Question him", "Grave" - named after a wicked and disobedient King whom the Israelites wanted because they rejected God. Saul/Paul - who's Ephesians address was penned exactly 666 years after the writing of the prophet Habakkuk, who mentions him in Habakkuk chapter 2 as a deceiver and who leads people astray.
It isn't merely an opinion that I happen to hold it is what the holy scriptures explicitly state. You happen to reject those holy scriptures so you reach whatever conclusions suit.
I reject the false apostle Saul/Paul.
It is what my religion tells me because it is what Christ taught and what the apostles transmitted as the teaching of Christ. You reject many of the teachings of Christ because you reject the holy scriptures that contain them. That is more a matter of your religion being divergent from Christianity than it is a peculiarity of my religion. The truth is that every Christian Church and virtually every Christian denomination and group rejects the dietary laws of the old covenant because they were abrogated.
Nope - you reject the real teachings of Christ in favor of the deceiver Saul/Paul's teachings - who is not a real apostle despite what he claims.
Yes, and also from eating finned fish, vegetables, grains, fruit, and all manner of foods. Your argument is highly biased by selectivity in the claims you advance. Sure one can be infected by various pathogens by eating almost any food. That is why the condition is called food poisoning rather than pork & shell fish poisoning.
No, it is rightly called shellfish poisoning if it is from shellfish. Try googling the term.
Your final observation is strange when one considers that other demons were cast out in the holy scriptures and did not infect pigs. In at least one case the Lord spoke of demons wandering looking for a home. Using the kind of interpretation you've advanced we ought to be careful of wildernesses. "Then Jesus was led up by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil." (Matthew 4:1) "'When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it wanders through waterless regions looking for a resting-place, but it finds none. Then it says, "I will return to my house from which I came." When it comes, it finds it empty, swept, and put in order. Then it goes and brings along seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and live there; and the last state of that person is worse than the first. So will it be also with this evil generation.'" (Matthew 12:43-45)
I am glad that few exegetes would offer such an absurd doctrine built on so inadequate a foundation as the one you've used.
It is not strange. Pigs just happened to be in the area and according to God - they are unclean animals. Like vultures and other unclean animals - they are designed as the world's garbage collectors. So when Yeshua cast some demons into them, it was simply a matter of letting the garbage collectors take out the garbage. The demons, from memory even asked to be sent in to herd of swine.