JOHN 7:1 JESUS HAD BROTHERS

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Meaning you deny Yeshua "came in the flesh".


Obviously not. As is obvious, as everyone knows, I specifically affirmed such. But then that's not the topic here, it's yet another, still another, one more attempt to evade.


What you are obviously EVADING is that you can't find the verse that states, "Mary had sex" And "Mary had other kids." Your claim.... you state the Bible states that.... thus a very simply (and obvious) request (evaded for pages and pages, weeks and weeks) just quote those two verses: "Mary had sex" and "Mary had other kids." Simple. Easy (if you're correct and that Bible says that).


Yes, Jesus opened Mary's womb.... no one here denies that..
+ But that has nothing, absolutely nothing, nothing whatsoever to do with supporting the claim that Mary had lotsa sex and lotsa kids.
+ It has nothing, absolutely nothing, nothing whatsoever to do with the claim that the English words "wife" and "husband" in your English Bible mandates that Mary had lotsa sex at the time (thus denying the Virgin Birth and divinity of Jesus).
+ It has nothing, absolutely nothing, nothing whatsoever to do with supporting that the English word "brother" in your English translation mandates that Mary had other kids.
+ Just another, still another, yet one more attempt to derail and evade the obvious: Your claim is false.





 

pinacled

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 24, 2015
Messages
2,862
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Obviously not. As is obvious, as everyone knows, I specifically affirmed such. But then that's not the topic here, it's yet another, still another, one more attempt to evade.


What you are obviously EVADING is that you can't find the verse that states, "Mary had sex" And "Mary had other kids." Your claim.... you state the Bible states that.... thus a very simply (and obvious) request (evaded for pages and pages, weeks and weeks) just quote those two verses: "Mary had sex" and "Mary had other kids." Simple. Easy (if you're correct and that Bible says that).


Yes, Jesus opened Mary's womb.... no one here denies that..
+ But that has nothing, absolutely nothing, nothing whatsoever to do with supporting the claim that Mary had lotsa sex and lotsa kids.
+ It has nothing, absolutely nothing, nothing whatsoever to do with the claim that the English words "wife" and "husband" in your English Bible mandates that Mary had lotsa sex at the time (thus denying the Virgin Birth and divinity of Jesus).
+ It has nothing, absolutely nothing, nothing whatsoever to do with supporting that the English word "brother" in your English translation mandates that Mary had other kids.
+ Just another, still another, yet one more attempt to derail and evade the obvious: Your claim is false.
The op made no such claim.
You are reacting based on a defense mechanism due to the instilled dogmatic oath.

The op only mentioned brothers.
 

pinacled

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 24, 2015
Messages
2,862
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Obviously not. As is obvious, as everyone knows, I specifically affirmed such. But then that's not the topic here, it's yet another, still another, one more attempt to evade.


What you are obviously EVADING is that you can't find the verse that states, "Mary had sex" And "Mary had other kids." Your claim.... you state the Bible states that.... thus a very simply (and obvious) request (evaded for pages and pages, weeks and weeks) just quote those two verses: "Mary had sex" and "Mary had other kids." Simple. Easy (if you're correct and that Bible says that).


Yes, Jesus opened Mary's womb.... no one here denies that..
+ But that has nothing, absolutely nothing, nothing whatsoever to do with supporting the claim that Mary had lotsa sex and lotsa kids.
+ It has nothing, absolutely nothing, nothing whatsoever to do with the claim that the English words "wife" and "husband" in your English Bible mandates that Mary had lotsa sex at the time (thus denying the Virgin Birth and divinity of Jesus).
+ It has nothing, absolutely nothing, nothing whatsoever to do with supporting that the English word "brother" in your English translation mandates that Mary had other kids.
+ Just another, still another, yet one more attempt to derail and evade the obvious: Your claim is false.
Jesus opening the womb also entails that due to his birth Mary is no longer a virgin.
Which is a very basic understanding of what "came in the flesh" means. Something that is denied by certain sects and calls into question why a further denial of joseph and mary consummating the marriage after the birth.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Jesus opening the womb also entails that due to his birth Mary is no longer a virgin.


Absurd.

"Virgin" means "had no sex." Yes, a child was born to Mary but once again, you are fundamentally denying the VIRGIN Birth of Our Lord (and likely His divinity that rests on such). Yes, she gave birth to JESUS. That does not prove ERGO Mary had sex...and it does NOT prove ERGO Mary had other kids.

Your ASSUMPTION that if a woman gives birth, she must be having sex is probably valid, most of the time, but not with Mary. Mary giving birth to Jesus (Yes, Jesus "opening" her womb) does NOT prove the Bible is wrong when it calls Mary a virgin... it does NOT prove that Mary had lotsa sex.





denial of joseph and mary consummating the marriage after the birth.


You refuse to give any verse that says Mary had sex.
You insist the Bible states she did, but you persistently (for weeks now) REFUSE to state the verse that states Mary had sex.

I'm NOT claiming she did not (after Jesus was born). I'm claiming the Bible does not state (one way or the other). Your claim is that Mary did have sex. It's just you obviously can't find where the Bible says that.... or Tradition. Your position was invented about 200 years ago by radically liberal Protestants who denied the Virgin Birth, denied the divinity of Jesus, denied the reliability of the Bible and held that Christianity is mostly myth. They noted their position was nowhere in the Bible (something you won't admit but have made obvious), they just didn't believe that whole Virgin thing.


Your claim that the Bible says she had sex is.... wrong.
Your claim that the English words "husband/wife" in your translation proves they had sex is ... wrong (and denies the Virgin Birth)
Your claim that the English word "brother" proves that Mary had lotsa kids is.... wrong.



See posts 311 and 317





.
 
Last edited:

pinacled

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 24, 2015
Messages
2,862
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Absurd.

"Virgin" means "had no sex." Yes, a child was born to Mary but once again, you are fundamentally denying the VIRGIN Birth of Our Lord (and likely His divinity that rests on such). Yes, she gave birth to JESUS. That does not prove ERGO Mary had sex...and it does NOT prove ERGO Mary had other kids.

Your ASSUMPTION that if a woman gives birth, she must be having sex is probably valid, most of the time, but not with Mary. Mary giving birth to Jesus (Yes, Jesus "opening" her womb) does NOT prove the Bible is wrong when it calls Mary a virgin... it does NOT prove that Mary had lotsa sex.








You refuse to give any verse that says Mary had sex.
You insist the Bible states she did, but you persistently (for weeks now) REFUSE to state the verse that states Mary had sex.

I'm NOT claiming she did not (after Jesus was born). I'm claiming the Bible does not state (one way or the other). Your claim is that Mary did have sex. It's just you obviously can't find where the Bible says that.... or Tradition. Your position was invented about 200 years ago by radically liberal Protestants who denied the Virgin Birth, denied the divinity of Jesus, denied the reliability of the Bible and held that Christianity is mostly myth. They noted their position was nowhere in the Bible (something you won't admit but have made obvious), they just didn't believe that whole Virgin thing.


Your claim that the Bible says she had sex is.... wrong.
Your claim that the English words "husband/wife" in your translation proves they had sex is ... wrong (and denies the Virgin Birth)
Your claim that the English word "brother" proves that Mary had lotsa kids is.... wrong.



See posts 311 and 317





.
The honest absurdity is that after giving birth to the Lord , mary remained a virgin.
Especially concerning a biological/anatomical literal plain meaning definition of virgin.

Thankyou for sharing your beliefs.
There's no need for repetitive long post about topics that have nothing to do with our particular discourse.

Blessings Always
 
Last edited:

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Mary remained a virgin.

That means she had no sex.... ever.

That also means she had no other children.

That's your position.





.
 

pinacled

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 24, 2015
Messages
2,862
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
That means she had no sex.... ever.

That also means she had no other children.

That's your position.





.
No.
And please refrain from manipulating my words.
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
32,649
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
That means she had no sex.... ever.

That also means she had no other children.

That's your position.





.
Josiah, you changed the meaning of his post when you cropped his quoted words.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Josiah, you changed the meaning of his post when you cropped his quoted words.


Did I?

So maybe YOU can figure it out.... is this poster claiming that Mary DID have sex or that she remained a virgin? Is this poster claiming she had other children or she did not? This poster has been arguing with me since January, and I have not been able to make heads or tails of what the poster's position. Go back to January 4 and read 'em. I only know this: Whatever I post is claimed to be wrong, even though RARELY is there any engagement in a discussion, just a lot of derailing, evading and diversions. This poster entered on January 4. You can read the posts yourself.

You tell me, Lamm. What IS the position of this poster? Where is that stated... and is it stated consistently?



.



.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Josiah, you changed the meaning of his post when you cropped his quoted words.


Here is what you posted (this time....)

The honest absurdity is that after giving birth to the Lord , mary remained a virgin.

So...

Jesus was born... after that.... Mary remained a virgin.

Is that not what you meant? Did you mean to post that Mary did NOT remain a virgin after Jesus was born?
Did you mean that she remained a virgin for an undisclosed amount of time but then stopped being a virgin?
What did you mean by "The honest absurdity is that after giving birth to the Lord , mary remained a virgin."




.
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
32,649
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Did I?

So maybe YOU can figure it out.... is this poster claiming that Mary DID have sex or that she remained a virgin? Is this poster claiming she had other children or she did not? This poster has been arguing with me since January, and I have not been able to make heads or tails of what the poster's position. Go back to January 4 and read 'em. I only know this: Whatever I post is claimed to be wrong, even though RARELY is there any engagement in a discussion, just a lot of derailing, evading and diversions. This poster entered on January 4. You can read the posts yourself.

You tell me, Lamm. What IS the position of this poster? Where is that stated... and is it stated consistently?

Pinacled stated his belief that he feels that Mary was no longer a virgin because she gave birth (to Jesus). His definition of virgin is not the one that the dictionary uses.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Pinacled stated his belief that he feels that Mary was no longer a virgin because she gave birth (to Jesus). His definition of virgin is not the one that the dictionary uses.


He said, "The honest absurdity is that after giving birth to the Lord , mary remained a virgin."
One cannot "remain" something they no longer are.

Even if he is changing the entire meaning of the word "virgin" (and thus missing the ENTIRE point of the doctrines we are discussing), then it still means that Mary REMAINED exactly as she was BEFORE Jesus was born..... She "REMAINED" a virgin.

Again, if this poster is defining "virgin" as "one who never has given birth" (and how absurd is that. hum then I'M a virgin) then how is it true that she gave birth but REMAINED a virgin if one looses their virginity by giving birth?



.
 

pinacled

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 24, 2015
Messages
2,862
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
He said, "The honest absurdity is that after giving birth to the Lord , mary remained a virgin."
One cannot "remain" something they no longer are.

Even if he is changing the entire meaning of the word "virgin" (and thus missing the ENTIRE point of the doctrines we are discussing), then it still means that Mary REMAINED exactly as she was BEFORE Jesus was born..... She "REMAINED" a virgin.

Again, if this poster is defining "virgin" as "one who never has given birth" (and how absurd is that. hum then I'M a virgin) then how is it true that she gave birth but REMAINED a virgin if one looses their virginity by giving birth?



.
Lammchen clarified precisely what I stated.

And I'm thankful for her witness.

When conveying words in english letters/language.
Perhaps there is an issue in translation software.

Do speak and type in English?
 

pinacled

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 24, 2015
Messages
2,862
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
He said, "The honest absurdity is that after giving birth to the Lord , mary remained a virgin."
One cannot "remain" something they no longer are.

Even if he is changing the entire meaning of the word "virgin" (and thus missing the ENTIRE point of the doctrines we are discussing), then it still means that Mary REMAINED exactly as she was BEFORE Jesus was born..... She "REMAINED" a virgin.

Again, if this poster is defining "virgin" as "one who never has given birth" (and how absurd is that. hum then I'M a virgin) then how is it true that she gave birth but REMAINED a virgin if one looses their virginity by giving birth?



.
I changed the of meaning virgin just as you changed the meaning of wife, husband, and brothers.

Do you understand?
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Lammchen clarified precisely what I stated.


Sooo.... your definition of "virgin" is "one who has not given birth." Is that correct?

Sooo.... you hold that Mary gave birth to Jesus but remained a virgin. As you posted?

So, my question: Why do you hold that Mary remained a virgin after she was no longer a virgin (using the definition Lamm indicated and you now state is correct?



My consistent position (which you have been debating for 4 months) is that the BIBLE does not state if Mary had sex after Jesus was born, it doesn't state she did and equally it doesn't state she did not. You have claimed the Bible says she DID have sex but have persistently refused to state the verse where this is said.

My consistent position (which you have been debating for 4 months) is that the BIBLE does not state whether Mary had children other than Jesus - it doens't state she did and equally it doesn't state she did not.

HOWEVER, on both counts, ancient (from no later than 110 AD) and universal (for some 1800 years) TRADITION is that Mary never had sex and never had other children... and there's nothing in the Bible to indicate this is wrong.


Some (not you) have insisted that a modern ENGLISH word found in a modern ENGLISH translation seems to THEM to IMPLY that Mary had lotsa sex and kids. I don't challenge that, it's just the Bible was not written in English and what is "IMPLIED" to someone is thus not stated. In koine Greek, NOTHING is implied in this regard. Indeed, if otherwise, then the Virgin Birth is a lie.... the divinity of Jesus is a lie.... and my mother gave birth to millions of people.





.


.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I changed the of meaning virgin just as you changed the meaning of wife, husband, and brothers.


The words "wife" "husband" and "brother" do not appear in the orginal text of the Bible. They are ENGLISH words that appear in ENGLISH translation. What those words MAY POSSIBLY mean in modern English has nothing to do with the text, which was (for the New Testament) written in koine Greek. It matters not a bit what some guy FEELS is IMPLIED by some modern ENGLISH word never occuring in the Bible.

Positions about the Bible are to be based on the ORIGINAL WORDS, not something one feels is implied by some modern English word in some English translation or some modern Japanese word in a Japanese translation. This is why your pastor doesn't use any translation... this is why he took years of koine Greek and biblical Hebrew in school, why such is required for ordination in most denominations. If it is the modern English that is normative, then all pastors for 2000 years around the world would learn English for Bible study, wouldn't they?

NO, I did not change the words "wife" "husband" or "brother." You just substituted one possible meaning of some modern English word (or just something you feel is IMPLIED by that English word) for the words actually stated. And thus made absurd positions (including denying the Virgin Birth, indicating that Christians all were born from the same woman, etc.).



"MARRIED." A c;laim was made that this English word mandates that the relationship has been consummated and there have been born to such children. This isn't even true in English! But I showed that the Bible TWICE (and only twice) calls Mary and Joseph "wife/husband" and in both cases, it's BEFORE Jesus was born. So, if it's true the word "wife" MUST mean "consummated" then Mary not a virgin when Jesus was born. Not only is the claim baseless (even in English) but the claim then denies the Virgin Birth of our Lord. IF your claim is true that "wife" and "husband" mandate lotsa sex and kids, then you must deny the Virgin Birth and the divinity of Jesus. But in koine Greek, those words do not mean that. Indeed, they don't necessarily in English either! I know lots of couples who have no children but I'm guessing have sex. And yes, I've read that some seniors marry but never have sex.


"UNTIL.'' In 21st Century English, the word USUALLY (but not always) implies that the situation changed. But the verse in the Bible wasn't written in English or in the 21st Century. The koine Greek word does NOT - at all - imply a changed situation.


"BROTHER" In koine Greek, the word RARELY means "have the same parents." I gave biblical examples where it obviously does NOT mean share the same parents. Friend, you and I are brothers. And of course, there was no word for "step-brother" in koine Greek (such was just called "brother") so if these were children of Joseph but not Mary, there would be no other word available in all the Greek language to speak of them. And while there was a word for "cousin" (found also in the Bible) such were usually called "brother." Brother is simply a far broader word in koine Greek than in 21st Century American English, my brother.



Brother... consider.... in the Greek Orthodox Church, they know Greek. They read Greek. They speak Greek. And NEVER in all its history has even one person in the Greek Orthodox Church ever thought that Mary ceased being a virgin or she ever had other children. Is this because Greek speaking people don't know Greek? If the Greek word translated "wife" means "has sex and children" why does not one Greek speaking Greek Orthodox Christian know that? Why don't they all hold that Mary had sex and other children (and thus deny the Virgin Birth) since the word "wife" means "consummated woman with kids"? Don't they know the meaning of this Greek word? Or it doesn't matter because you feel something else is IMPLIED by an ENGLISH word? And if the Greek word for "until" MUST mean "but a 180 happened after that" why don't Greek speaking people know that? Then why for 2000 years has not one Greek speaking person believed the situation changed? Do Greek speaking people not know Greek? Or is all that matters is what you feel is implied by some English word in some English translation?



I'll ask again...

Where is the verse that states, "Mary and Joseph consummated their relationship"?
Where is the verse that states, "Mary had other children"?

You claim the Bible says so.... but you won't say where. Why?
Can you even find those statements in your own English translation?


All you can do is delete the Greek.... substitute some modern English word... appoint yourself to declare that you feel is IMPLIED by some the English word... and then based on that, claim something you evidently know the Bible never says and not one Christian for 1800 years believed.



Blessings on your Holy Week observation...


- Josiah



.
 

pinacled

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 24, 2015
Messages
2,862
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Sooo.... your definition of "virgin" is "one who has not given birth." Is that correct?

Sooo.... you hold that Mary gave birth to Jesus but remained a virgin. As you posted?

So, my question: Why do you hold that Mary remained a virgin after she was no longer a virgin (using the definition Lamm indicated and you now state is correct?



My consistent position (which you have been debating for 4 months) is that the BIBLE does not state if Mary had sex after Jesus was born, it doesn't state she did and equally it doesn't state she did not. You have claimed the Bible says she DID have sex but have persistently refused to state the verse where this is said.

My consistent position (which you have been debating for 4 months) is that the BIBLE does not state whether Mary had children other than Jesus - it doens't state she did and equally it doesn't state she did not.

HOWEVER, on both counts, ancient (from no later than 110 AD) and universal (for some 1800 years) TRADITION is that Mary never had sex and never had other children... and there's nothing in the Bible to indicate this is wrong.


Some (not you) have insisted that a modern ENGLISH word found in a modern ENGLISH translation seems to THEM to IMPLY that Mary had lotsa sex and kids. I don't challenge that, it's just the Bible was not written in English and what is "IMPLIED" to someone is thus not stated. In koine Greek, NOTHING is implied in this regard. Indeed, if otherwise, then the Virgin Birth is a lie.... the divinity of Jesus is a lie.... and my mother gave birth to millions of people.





.


.
Leave the repetition aside please.

What I see and believe is that intimacy is a beautiful reminder of the sanctity of marriage.

In my opinion its against Torah when denying such to yosef and miriam.
And teaching others to denigrate their (yosef and miriams) relationship to celibate partners is disturbingly macabre and devoid of the pleasures(will) that The Most High intended.

Do you Understand?
 
Last edited:

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
What I see and believe is that intimacy is a beautiful reminder of the sanctity of marriage.


Of course. But that does not support the claim that Mary had sex and other kids.

Marriage and intimacy is a beautiful thing, but does that prove ergo Jesus had sex and kids? Nope. It seems Jesus CHOSE to not be be in a intimate marriage relationship, in spite of what you note. Sorry, your point (while true) does NOTHING to support these new claims about Mary. Your correct point does not prove Mary had lot of sex and kids.




its against Torah when denying such to yosef and miriam.


No one has ever claimed that Mary was denied anything.....

Since at least 110 AD until about 1800 AD, there was the universal belief that she did not, not that she was denied such. Huge difference.

The claim you variously promote is that she DID have sex and other kids.... You have presented nothing that states she ever had sex or other kids. No one has. The reason is simple: There is nothing in the Bible that states that. And no Christian who believed that for some 1800 years.



Still waiting....

Where is the Scripture that states, "Mary had sex"
Where is the Scripture that states, "Mary had other kids"
Where is the clear evidence of universal, clear belief since the early Second Century that Mary had lots of sex and kids?


All you can do is delete the word God inspired (the Greek).... substitute some modern English word you found in some English translation... appoint yourself to declare what you feel is IMPLIED by the modern English word some translator used... and then based solely on that, claim something you evidently know the Bible never says (even in some English translation) and not one Christian for 1800 years believed.



Blessings on your Easter.


- Josiah






.
 
Last edited:

pinacled

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 24, 2015
Messages
2,862
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
John 7:1 After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him.

7:2 Now the Jew's feast of tabernacles was at hand.

7:3 His brethren therefore said unto him, Depart hence, and go into Judaea, that thy disciples also may see the works that thou doest.

7:4 For there is no man that doeth any thing in secret, and he himself seeketh to be known openly. If thou do these things, shew thyself to the world.

7:5 For neither did his brethren believe in him.

Here is another clear case of scripture showing that Jesus had brothers. The brethren could not be disciples because they are differentiated in the text in John 7:3. In John 7:5 brethren could not mean a disciple because they did not believe in him.
The context of brethren is afore mentioned as "jewry".
 

pinacled

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 24, 2015
Messages
2,862
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Of course. But that does not support the claim that Mary had sex and other kids.

Marriage and intimacy is a beautiful thing, but does that prove ergo Jesus had sex and kids? Nope. It seems Jesus CHOSE to not be be in a intimate marriage relationship, in spite of what you note. Sorry, your point (while true) does NOTHING to support these new claims about Mary. Your correct point does not prove Mary had lot of sex and kids.







No one has ever claimed that Mary was denied anything.....

Since at least 110 AD until about 1800 AD, there was the universal belief that she did not, not that she was denied such. Huge difference.

The claim you variously promote is that she DID have sex and other kids.... You have presented nothing that states she ever had sex or other kids. No one has. The reason is simple: There is nothing in the Bible that states that. And no Christian who believed that for some 1800 years.



Still waiting....

Where is the Scripture that states, "Mary had sex"
Where is the Scripture that states, "Mary had other kids"
Where is the clear evidence of universal, clear belief since the early Second Century that Mary had lots of sex and kids?


All you can do is delete the word God inspired (the Greek).... substitute some modern English word you found in some English translation... appoint yourself to declare what you feel is IMPLIED by the modern English word some translator used... and then based solely on that, claim something you evidently know the Bible never says (even in some English translation) and not one Christian for 1800 years believed.



Blessings on your Easter.


- Josiah






.
Likewise there is no mention of their(yosef/miriam)celibacy after Yeshua was born.

Blessings Always
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom