Some people like Italian food. Some prefer Chinese food.
I don't think we should condemn either.
Now, we might question the nutritional content of ANY and ALL styles of food, but then the issue would not be the style but the nutrition. Frankly, I think society is ENRICHED by the lively diversity of styles of foods.... I think our society would be less if all of us only ate Oatmeal ... 3 times a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.
Frankly, my tastes in worship leans traditional. This is probably because I was raised on Catholicism and got use to that (think comfort food, lol) , and I LEARNED the meaning of all this and found it to be rich and very satisfying. I like very liturgical worship and rather traditional music. BUT THAT'S ME. BTW, I also like some foods but not others. My brother now goes to this HUGE non-denom church that has worship that is probably 50 minutes of LOUD (I mean deafening LOUD) rock music (very very well done, btw - very professional) and maybe 20 minutes of "sermon" (very, very shallow, weak preaching - mostly "HOW TO LIVE" stuff). Not for me. I disliked the music and I didn't appreciate the sermon. I felt all of it was shallow and weak. BUT I think that type of music CAN be rich and meaningful - even if I don't like that style. My church has very liturgical worship and pretty traditional hymns. Very rich, deep. But then we get 50 in church on a Sunday, my bro's church gets thousands - so many they can't get them all in the building and must do video feeds to coffee places, etc. nearby.
Some like Italian food. Some Japanese. Some Mexican. As long as there is good nutrition - I don't think it matters. And the diversity probably enriches people.
- Josiah