Jesus was resurrected because the sacrifice was accepted.
This is not in question by the OP and subsequent posts (responses) at all. It is already granted, accepted, admitted, acknowledged, stated and defended.
Part of the vows that the Son (Jesus) of the Father made was to take upon Himself the "likeness of sinful (fallen) flesh" (Rom. 8:3).
Psa 40:6 Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: burnt offering and sin offering hast thou not required.
Psa 40:7 Then said I, Lo, I come: in the volume of the book it is written of me,
Psa 40:8 I delight to do thy will, O my God: yea, thy law is within my heart.
Psa 40:9 I have preached righteousness in the great congregation: lo, I have not refrained my lips, O LORD, thou knowest.
Psa 40:10 I have not hid thy righteousness within my heart; I have declared thy faithfulness and thy salvation: I have not concealed thy lovingkindness and thy truth from the great congregation.
Psa 40:11 Withhold not thou thy tender mercies from me, O LORD: let thy lovingkindness and thy truth continually preserve me.
Psa 40:12 For innumerable evils have compassed me about: mine iniquities have taken hold upon me, so that I am not able to look up; they are more than the hairs of mine head: therefore my heart faileth me.
Heb_10:5 Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me:
Heb_10:7 Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God.
Heb_10:9 Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.
Jesus promised the Father:
Psa_116:14 I will pay my vows unto the LORD now in the presence of all his people.
Psa_116:18 I will pay my vows unto the LORD now in the presence of all his people,
The Father accepted:
Psa_61:5 For thou, O God, hast heard my vows: thou hast given me the heritage of those that fear thy name.
Jesus ascended into heaven.
This is not in question by the OP and subsequent posts (responses) at all. It is already granted, accepted, admitted, acknowledged, stated and defended.
Jesus, being resurrected, dieth no more, and could only have been subject to death, by having taken upon Himself the "sinful (fallen) flesh" (Rom. 8:3) of mankind:
Rom_6:9 Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.
Rev_1:18 I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.
Rev_2:8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive;
That body which Jesus ascended with, is now immortalized, and seated in the Highest Heaven upon the throne of Eternal Deity, at the right hand of the Majesty (Father) on High.
Php_3:21 Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.
Heb_1:3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;
Heb_8:1 Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens;
Please notice, that mankind has a "vile body" of the flesh, which is what Jesus took upon Himself, and had to to save / deliver us:
Heb_2:14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;
Because you deny the trinity, ...
I deny the Roman Catholic "trinity" and "Nicaean trinitarianism", and made this most clear, but you did not desire to engage me in any conversation about what I actually believe, nor read what was presented in charity (Pro. 18:13,17), and summarily dismissed what I would say, by having shut down the thread by prerogative force of position in authority here. It is not different than the inquisition in silencing their opposition. I have many citations about what 'catholics' (small 'c') do to those who differ from them. In other words, the fault is not mine that you do not understand my position. That belongs to another. Since I am not allowed to discuss what I believe on the subject, there is no point in engaging here about it, since it is not the primary subject of the OP. I would have some specific questions for you, in the other thread (now closed), about the "una substantia" and the secondary nature Jesus took and how it applies to Roman "trinitarianism", that is inescpable.
... you deny that Jesus is both man and God.
Where you obtained this wrong idea from, I cannot say, since my OP's and responses have always been clear.
Jesus is (and always was, and will be) Deity - "LORD", "God" (Jhn. 1:1c; Heb. 1:8-12), and later in due time, as such also is "God manifest in the flesh." (1 Tim. 3:16).
Jesus also took upon Himself the sinful (fallen) flesh of mankind, and became man (Php. 2:5-11; Rom. 8:3, &c.).
Thus Jesus is both "man and God". That you desire to misunderstand (or worse misrepresent, God forbid!) my position, is not my fault. That belongs to another, since I have been most transparent about what I believe and share.
Mostly correct, with the final part, incorrect.
A simple yes or no instead of a long-winded post inserting a bunch of links will do.
Try not to control how I respond, please, as I do not seek to dictate how you respond, in charity (1 Cor. 13). That would be appreciated. I am not a puppet or robot to be dictated orders to. I am a sinner saved by the grace through faith, a blood-bought born again child of the Most High God by the shed blood of Jesus, and by the application of it by the Holy Ghost / Spirit. As such, I am your brother, dear sister. As your brother, please grant me the courtesy of responding in the freedom granted me by our Father.
In short, so that you may also be satisfied,
Yes, most is correct, but no, not all is correct. I have attempted to show which is which in my reply to your response.