Lanman87
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2020
- Messages
- 732
- Age
- 55
- Location
- Bible Belt
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Non-Denominational
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
You are missing the point. It is the church itself that defines who is faithful and true. If you are Catholic and the church defines a bishop as valid, then they are valid. There is no room for doubt, else you are doubting the infallibility of the church. If you are saying the church got it wrong by choosing men as bishops who either aren't qualified or else teach error then you are saying the church isn't infallible.the valid and faithful bishops are the true church,
If someone, after they become bishop, starts to teach error, then it is the responsibility of the church to depose that person from being a bishop. If the church doesn't live up to that responsibility and someone remains a bishop while teaching error, then the church is in error and not infallible.
You can't say the church is infallible and chose heretics (or keep heretics) as bishops. Either the church is infallible and every person chosen as bishops was an act of God through the power of the Holy Spirit or some bishops were chosen in error, in which case you can't say the church is infallible.
So which is it? Are all bishops that the church has chosen and ordained valid or is the church not infallible?