Some things which the press calls "sexual conduct" SUPPOSEDLY done 39 years ago..... and there is ZERO evidence....
There is the evidence for the women who was 14 then he molested her. There is the evidence of three others who were between 16 and 18 who tell stories of a 30-something Roy Moore asking them on dates and engaging in conduct that - while legal - is consistent with the words of woman who was the 14 year old. Roy Moore was 32 at the time. He's 70 or so now. Why does matter if it happened 39 years ago, does that mitigate, does it invalidate her statement?
The sexual conduct was to undress himself and to undress her (aged 14 and he 32) and to place his hands on her breasts (she still had her bra on) and private parts (she still had her panties on) while guiding her hand to touch his erect private parts (he still had his underpants on). That is sexual conduct is it not?
PS: the women who was 14 at the time voted for Donald Trump and for the republicans.