- Joined
- Sep 1, 2017
- Messages
- 7,760
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Anglican
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
Ah, yes. Now that I read this, it makes sense and I do see why it is funny.I just thought it was funny the way the Democrats said voting Johnson was effectively voting Trump while Republicans said voting Johnson was effectively voting Clinton.
There was silly old me thinking a vote for Johnson was effectively a vote for Johnson. I get the reasoning behind it - in a similar vein I guess the people who voted for Ralph Nader in 2000 were unlikely to have chosen Bush had they been forced to choose between the major parties - I just found it funny.