Oh, geez, you have got to be kidding!!
Why have I got to be kidding?
Do you want to see WWIII and nuclear war starting, no respect for women because of his example as a leader?
With respect Ruth, this line of reasoning is just silly. To assume that Trump will start WW3 suggests he wants to see more or less the annihilation of the human race. Mutually Assured Destruction pretty much guarantees that the major nuclear powers (think NATO, Russia etc) aren't going to fire first because they know the counterstrike would wipe them out.
This whole "no respect for women" seems way overblown as far as I can see. Yes, he said some things that were grossly inappropriate but frankly you'd probably struggle to find anyone who hadn't said anything they later regretted. And then of course are the women who were apparently assaulted by him and apparently forgot all about it until a month before the election.
He has no respect for many cultures and could cause a racial war, too.
Perhaps, but frankly as far as I can see race relations in the US are the worst they have been in a long time and under a black President. I'd rather kick the applecart than vote for four more years of the same.
He is the wrong choice for candidate. Are you okay? I really have a hard time believing that a sensible person like you would vote for him.
With respect, comments like this highlight the yawning divide in politics very nicely. Do you really struggle to see that someone sensible might disagree with you? Do you have any idea just how divisive a comment like that, in itself, sounds? The suggestion that nobody with any sense could possibly take a different viewpoint is itself extremely exclusive, which is ironic given your earlier comments about lacking respect for other people.
Hillary is a compassionate woman who cares about people.
I remain unconvinced Hillary cares about anyone except Hillary. Look at just some of what Wikileaks has released and it appears her only concern is getting into power. It's pretty much accepted that the internal DNC elections were rigged to keep Bernie Sanders out of the running, which in itself doesn't paint a picture of an honest candidate.
And then...
She has paid for her mistakes and taken a public beating for them like no one else has.
Except she hasn't paid for her mistakes, she's fluffed and stalled, she's asked "what difference does it make?". Had you or I been "grossly negligent" with state secrets we'd most likely be in jail. If we were lucky we'd get away with having our security clearance revoked. Now she's under a re-opened investigation from the FBI, apparently due to them finding more emails while investigating the husband of her close aide who had allegedly been sending "sexts" to an underage girl. Just how much of this can people attribute to "Republican mud-slinging" without also wondering how much of the media coverage of Donald Trump is "Democrat mud-slinging"?
Not even close to enough if even some of the allegations are true. If you or I are caught doing wrong we get punished, and merely saying sorry just doesn't cut it. Given the way things come to light in dribs and drabs with her I have to wonder whether she's sorry for what she did or merely sorry that she got caught.
She has the maturity, wisdom and experience to be the next president.:stars:
The wisdom to be the next president? A person who lacked the wisdom to realise her private email server was a really bad idea? A person who doesn't seem to think an FBI investigation into her affairs warrants even stepping back from such a high-profile position even if only for as long as it takes to clear her name? A person who doesn't seem worried, even assuming she had no involvement at all in the process, that she could only get elected by conspiring to keep her opponent for the nomination out through whatever means it took? A person who didn't see any problem with letting foreign nations (who treat women as second-class citizens) donate millions to her foundation while in high office? If this is wisdom I shudder to think what folly looks like.
