Let's deal with temperature first. The heat of the day is primarily due to how long it takes things to heat up. Just before daybreak is usually the coldest part of the day because it's had all night to cool. At noon, yes, the light is hitting more directly and the heat from it is most intense. It's getting warmer most quickly at this time, however, despite that, it's not the hottest part of the day. Rather, it's usually mid-afternoon, before sundown, that a given area sees its highest temperature, because it's been warming all day. As well, because the angle of the Sun in relation to the point on ground where you are standing changes as the Earth rotates. As well our atmosphere scatters and absorbs sunlight. The more air the light from the Sun has to travel through, the less of it makes it to you on the ground. Less sun light, less energy, lower temperature. You can observe this scattering effect by noting that the colour of the Sun’s light changes throughout the day from red to blue/white to red. The same thing happens due to the Earth’s tilt in summer and winter. In summer the Sun’s light is more directly overhead than in winter. More atmosphere, less makes it to the ground. Add to that, that for a fixed point on the ground the distance to the Sun changes as the Earth rotates/orbits the Sun. That also changes the amount of energy we get. You can observe this drop off of energy according to distance when driving at night. The headlights of an oncoming car get brighter as it approaches you.
Let's deal with temperature first.
Ok. Does this mean you will deal with the video in the OP and Skiba's video next?
The heat of the day is primarily due to how long it takes things to heat up. Just before daybreak is usually the coldest part of the day because it's had all night to cool. At noon, yes, the light is hitting more directly and the heat from it is most intense. It's getting warmer most quickly at this time, however, despite that, it's not the hottest part of the day. Rather, it's usually mid-afternoon, before sundown, that a given area sees its highest temperature, because it's been warming all day.
Granted that "noon" is not Midday as a region will get more or less hours of sunlight depending on where it is and at what time of year, I accept this explanation. Even past Midday (defined strictly by the midpoint of the daylight hours), this is correct, and for the reasons you say. I may have erred in my terms but not in how they are applied to the model that you believe.
The diameter of Ball Earth is said to be 7,917.5 miles. In terms of distance of Ball Earth to an object outside of it this distance of 7,917.5 miles represents a straight line through the center of the earth from one side to another - a full 180 degrees. To illustrate this further take any point on Ball Earth that is nearest to another celestial body, then run a straight line through the center of Ball Earth to the opposite side of it. The point on the other side will be exactly 7,917.5 miles further away from that celestial body than the original point.
In the context we are discussing, however, the distance covered is less than this, as we are only including 25% of a 24 hour period - the point between sunrise to Midday, or Midday to sunset for a given region.
In the heliocentric model the sun is about 93 million miles away.
Given any point on the earth closest to the sun (about 23.4 degrees off the Equator per the "tilt") the distance from sunrise to Midday or Midday to sunset is going to be 1979.375 miles, or 1/4 of the diameter of the Earth.
Percentage of complete diameter of the earth to distance of the sun (7,917.5 miles to 93 million miles) = 0.008513440860215054%. About 8/1000ths of 1 percent.
Of the area we are actually talking about:
Percentage of 25% of the diameter of the earth to distance of the sun (1979.375 miles to 93 million miles) = 0.0021283602150537636%. About 2/1000ths of 1 percent.
----------------------------------------
All of this to give you a clear indication of the relative distances we are talking about for the temperature ranges involved for a single day.
Now let's travel to our nearest celestial body according to heliocentric theory - the moon at the given distance of 238,900 miles. Are you beginning to grasp the temperature problems at hand? If a mere 2,000 miles represents the spectrum of temperature on a summer day's heat (or lack thereof in winter), then what would it be at 4000? 8000? 16,000? 32,000 closer or farther? And what about at 238,900?
Even if one supposes that the Earth's atmosphere "traps" the heat for a limited period causing an increase over this period, this accumulating rise in temperatures doesn't come close to the temps that would be experienced at much closer or father distances from the sun without the "trapping" effect. Start the distance at the place where Earth is coldest and move the Earth just 10,000 miles further from the sun. The whole Earth would be frozen. Or start from our distance and move the Earth 10,000 miles closer to the sun - everything is melted and no life exists here.
When temps are taken into account the "science" that says we went to the moon (or Mars) or even that we could begin to approach them by a tiny fraction of the stated distances without melting or freezing is ridiculous.
