Genesis chapter one.

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I don't know exactly the post you are addressing. So I can only assume you wanted to create the confusion.
On the contrary, you could assume that you weren't able to identify the post he was referring to. :rolleyes:



 

Lees

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Messages
2,182
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
On the contrary, you could assume that you weren't able to identify the post he was referring to. :rolleyes:

No, I already said that I didn't know the post he was referring to.

Thus my assumption still stands. I assume he only wanted to create confusion.

If you want to be his 'lap dog'...go ahead. He will pat you on the head.

Since you want to intervene in my discussion with another, then answer my questions in post #(79).

Yeah....I thought so.

Lees
 
Last edited:

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
No, I already said that I didn't know the post he was referring to.
Right. I was simply agreeing with that.

It's when you went on to add that therefore you think the other poster's intention was to confuse you that your thinking went astray. You'd already stated a reason...probably the most likely reason, when you admitted the following: ("I don't know exactly the post you are addressing.")
 

Lees

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Messages
2,182
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Right. I was simply agreeing with that.

It's when you went on to add that therefore you think the other poster's intention was to confuse you that your thinking went astray. You'd already stated a reason...probably the most likely reason, when you admitted the following: ("I don't know exactly the post you are addressing.")

No. You assume my thinking went astray. It didn't.

The presentation of the post by Fritz Kobus was confusing because it was not addressed. See post #(71)

Based on that presentation I assume his intention was to confuse. A just assumption seeing how he has not responded to my questions in post #(79). It's much easier to hide then to answer.

But of course, you know all about that, which is why you don't answer the questions either, when I asked you to.

So, go ahead and play your games. When your ready to answer the questions, get back with me.

Lees
 

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
No. You assume my thinking went astray. It didn't.
According to what you wrote, you missed the most obvious reason for your confusion...and did so right after you yourself spelled it out for the readers!

That's all. I'm sure you'll get over it.
 

Lees

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Messages
2,182
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
According to what you wrote, you missed the most obvious reason for your confusion...and did so right after you yourself spelled it out for the readers!

That's all. I'm sure you'll get over it.

I stated the reason. Fritz Kobus did not address his post. Thus the confusion. All he has to do is come back and answer my questions.

All you have to do is come back and answer my questions. But you won't. Why? Because the answer shows the shallowness of your position.

In post #(67) I was asked specific questions. Which I answered in post #(68). No response to my answers. Post #(71) may have been a response, yet one must assume it because it was not addressed. But even it did not offer any real substance.

So, in post (79), I asked some specific questions. Just like specific questions had been asked of me. What do I get? Nothing. Except you trying and licking up the damage.

You like to run interference when you think you don't have to account for that which is said. But, once you involve yourself in a post not addressed to you, you are accountable.

So if you are willing to answer the questions in post #(79) carry on. If not, and you and I both know you won't, then go and crawdad out of here.

Lees
 

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Maybe you won't get over it after all. :unsure:
 
Top Bottom