Pedrito
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2015
- Messages
- 1,032
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
==============================================================================================
Post #149 DHoffman:
With respect to Genesis authorship, there are theories that Moses complied the early chapters of Genesis from preexisting legends, some of them written. The sources are normally stated to be from other ancient civilisations. But it is also stated that various nominated sections of the early chapters were penned by nominated Biblical figures, including Ishmael. The confusion is confusing.
==============================================================================================
What is overlooked in those theories, is that authors of normal books sometimes change their styles within their books. It is done to engender different reactions in the readers. Think of Darth Vader music in the Star Wars movies as a parallel. Or Princess Leia’s theme.
But what about the Bible?
==============================================================================================
For instance, did Matthew fudge the figures in Matthew Chapter 1? Was he guilty of deliberate dishonesty (manipulation of figures) to make a point to his target (Jewish) readers? Do you know why this is being asked? Because if he did so, your Bible fails the test of being God-inspired, and your faith is based on a lie.
Matthew sought to associate a special number with Jesus. That number was indelibly associated with King David, from whose line the promised Messiah would come, and that number would be an important proof in Jewish eyes, that Jesus was that Messiah.
That number happens to be 14, and to prove his point, Matthew left three kings out of an actual list of 17, and used a name (Jeconiah) twice, once in each of two separate lists, to make the required count appear in both. Has that ever been brought to your attention by any of the “shepherds” you have had?
==============================================================================================
Facing those problems and finding the answers that God has placed for His dedicated followers to find (Proverbs 25:2 – who are the kings?), increases faith immeasurably, and glorifies God immensely.
The solution to one of those problems is highlighted by God, by His arranging a sudden change of style in the Hebrew text of a particular Old Testament passage. That change of style is too pointed to be coincidental.
I suggest (remembering that the existing chapter and verse divisions in our Bibles were not in the original text) that the changes of style in Genesis could be symptoms of something other than multiple authorship sources.
==============================================================================================
Post #149 DHoffman:
Adam may have written some of Genesis, at least four different authors wrote Genesis because the wording and style changes drastically.
With respect to Genesis authorship, there are theories that Moses complied the early chapters of Genesis from preexisting legends, some of them written. The sources are normally stated to be from other ancient civilisations. But it is also stated that various nominated sections of the early chapters were penned by nominated Biblical figures, including Ishmael. The confusion is confusing.
==============================================================================================
What is overlooked in those theories, is that authors of normal books sometimes change their styles within their books. It is done to engender different reactions in the readers. Think of Darth Vader music in the Star Wars movies as a parallel. Or Princess Leia’s theme.
But what about the Bible?
==============================================================================================
For instance, did Matthew fudge the figures in Matthew Chapter 1? Was he guilty of deliberate dishonesty (manipulation of figures) to make a point to his target (Jewish) readers? Do you know why this is being asked? Because if he did so, your Bible fails the test of being God-inspired, and your faith is based on a lie.
Matthew sought to associate a special number with Jesus. That number was indelibly associated with King David, from whose line the promised Messiah would come, and that number would be an important proof in Jewish eyes, that Jesus was that Messiah.
That number happens to be 14, and to prove his point, Matthew left three kings out of an actual list of 17, and used a name (Jeconiah) twice, once in each of two separate lists, to make the required count appear in both. Has that ever been brought to your attention by any of the “shepherds” you have had?
==============================================================================================
Facing those problems and finding the answers that God has placed for His dedicated followers to find (Proverbs 25:2 – who are the kings?), increases faith immeasurably, and glorifies God immensely.
The solution to one of those problems is highlighted by God, by His arranging a sudden change of style in the Hebrew text of a particular Old Testament passage. That change of style is too pointed to be coincidental.
I suggest (remembering that the existing chapter and verse divisions in our Bibles were not in the original text) that the changes of style in Genesis could be symptoms of something other than multiple authorship sources.
==============================================================================================