are you a lurker or stalker and what's the diff?

[Rens]

I read on internet that the whole forum was fake and in the hands of trolling exchristians. Don't know if it's true LOL but I just posted it there and then they banned me. I said you would ban Jesus here too. You were not allowed to talk about deliverance and post T.B. Joshua if someone was mentally ill and needed help. If they were all christians, LOL then I have accused some of being trolling atheists. Their own fault. If you want me to think you're a christian better behave like one. They banned me while I was witnessing to atheists. I found it highly suspicious and then I read that others said that the owner was a trolling atheist. They could tell me it wasn't true but they didn't. Stupid. Then I posted it in public LOL. Don't mess with the Dutch.

 

[Stravinsk]

^^ I was wondering why you were banned.

Hey, do you know what happened to EZ's board? It just up and got discontinued.

And I miss Maka.

 

[Rens]

^^ I was wondering why you were banned.

Hey, do you know what happened to EZ's board? It just up and got discontinued.

And I miss Maka.

Yes I miss them too. I looked once if they missed me and saw that MehGuy and others thought I was a sock. Lol post for 1 or 2 years, you think they're your best friends and they thought I was a sock. My 'best friends' didn't even want my email address pffff. EZ's board? I was only very short on Jesus rocks your socks, but I don't think it existst anymore. Were you Bookwornworm? That was a fabulous stalking action from me to become Bookwornwoman.

 

[Stravinsk]

Yes I miss them too. I looked once if they missed me and saw that MehGuy and others thought I was a sock. Lol post for 1 or 2 years, you think they're your best friends and they thought I was a sock. My 'best friends' didn't even want my email address pffff. EZ's board? I was only very short on Jesus rocks your socks, but I don't think it existst anymore. Were you Bookwornworm? That was a fabulous stalking action from me to become Bookwornwoman.

Yes, I was BookWornWorm. I loved that account. I got to kiss a bunch of members (on my profile page) and they all kept coming back to look. I couldn't post with it - because I never verified it, from memory. One person using a sock even complained that I owed her a kiss cuz I hadn't mentioned her. Yes, I knew you were Bookwornwoman - you kept looking at your Messy account, lol. That gave it away.

You gave me a scared. :rotfl:

 

[Rens]

Yes, I was BookWornWorm. I loved that account. I got to kiss a bunch of members (on my profile page) and they all kept coming back to look. I couldn't post with it - because I never verified it, from memory. One person using a sock even complained that I owed her a kiss cuz I hadn't mentioned her. Yes, I knew you were Bookwornwoman - you kept looking at your Messy account, lol. That gave it away.

You gave me a scared. :rotfl:

hahahahahahahaha I must practice more.
That thing you made was fabulous. Some were creeped out I had the idea. Magnificent. Everybody was just lurking on each others profiles.
It was funny, you changed the text and said you had nothing to do with Bookwornwoman.
I'm a silent guy.
I posted: I like silent guys hahahahahaha

 

[Stravinsk]

hahahahahahahaha I must practice more.
That thing you made was fabulous. Some were creeped out I had the idea. Magnificent. Everybody was just lurking on each others profiles.
It was funny, you changed the text and said you had nothing to do with Bookwornwoman.
I'm a silent guy.
I posted: I like silent guys hahahahahaha

I did change it to say I had nothing to do with "Bookwornwoman" because I thought people might suspect that. Also, I have never had a female account at the other place. Nor at any place, for that matter. That's one role I'm not comfortable playing.

 

[Rens]

Stalkers and lurkers unite!!

 

[Rens]

 

[Rens]

http://www.boredpanda.com/dog-creeps-his-owner-by-stalking-her-all-the-time/

 

[TurtleHare]

I read on internet that the whole forum was fake and in the hands of trolling exchristians. Don't know if it's true LOL but I just posted it there and then they banned me. I said you would ban Jesus here too. You were not allowed to talk about deliverance and post T.B. Joshua if someone was mentally ill and needed help. If they were all christians, LOL then I have accused some of being trolling atheists. Their own fault. If you want me to think you're a christian better behave like one. They banned me while I was witnessing to atheists. I found it highly suspicious and then I read that others said that the owner was a trolling atheist. They could tell me it wasn't true but they didn't. Stupid. Then I posted it in public LOL. Don't mess with the Dutch.

What forum is fake? Is it the same one the others are talking about?

 

[Rens]

What forum is fake? Is it the same one the others are talking about?

Yes, it can be slander, but what I read made total sense. I was talking to the one they said was a sock from the owner and if you posted in singles and it had a bad word in it or something days later you'd get a warning, but now immediate response and couldn't post anymore for doing nothing and I also read that one former mod said he couldn't believe people were so stupid to apologize for doing nothing so they could come back (I wasn't really banned first, I could apologize to them), when they were put in the corner like a schoolkid and that was exactly what happened and I was too addicted anyway, I wanted to leave, so I didn't care if they banned me. Posted it there on purpose and warned one catholic woman they were really hitting on with 2 socks. That whole concept that mods and owners can have socks is also just so weird and not transparent. If it's not true, it's their own fault that people believe it.

 

[Alithis]

nutz ... just ..nutz

 

[Stravinsk]

Not really. While there have been abuses, mostly they are exaggerated by frequent violators of the rules. You'll see that if the place gets big enough.

Phone call:

Hammster: "Hello"
Mystery person: "Is this Hammster?"
Hammster: "Yes"
Mystery person "How would you like to die, Hammster?"

Mystery person "How would the residents of the house Hammster frequents like to die? Only male members need answer. Here are some options"
Mystery person "How would the residents of the house Hammster frequents like to die? Only male members need answer. Here are some options"

*click*

Hammster: "Now that was strange. Must have been a wrong number or something. Wait, didn't their first question address me specifically? Golly gee. Nothing to worry about. A threat? Pffff. I think maybe they were just trying to sell me life insurance. Yes, that's it."

 

[Hammster]

Phone call:

Hammster: "Hello"
Mystery person: "Is this Hammster?"
Hammster: "Yes"
Mystery person "How would you like to die, Hammster?"

Mystery person "How would the residents of the house Hammster frequents like to die? Only male members need answer. Here are some options"
Mystery person "How would the residents of the house Hammster frequents like to die? Only male members need answer. Here are some options"

*click*

Hammster: "Now that was strange. Must have been a wrong number or something. Wait, didn't their first question address me specifically? Golly gee. Nothing to worry about. A threat? Pffff. I think maybe they were just trying to sell me life insurance. Yes, that's it."

So you took that as a female staffer wanting to kill you? Really?

 

[Stravinsk]

So you took that as a female staffer wanting to kill you? Really?

That is the equivalent of what happened if it were a phone call instead of a message board. The scenario I just painted. A threat - from someone.

The part about it being a female staffer, greatest suspect - came with the context you keep leaving out, and which I will continue to point out you keep leaving out.

Going to work on her writing style now. Maybe lets have some fun, I could possibly identify a great deal of her alternates. You know, how staff partly identified mine?

Or something else could happen. Something better than that.

 

[Hammster]

That is the equivalent of what happened if it were a phone call instead of a message board. The scenario I just painted. A threat - from someone.

The part about it being a female staffer, greatest suspect - came with the context you keep leaving out, and which I will continue to point out you keep leaving out.

Going to work on her writing style now. Maybe lets have some fun, I could possibly identify a great deal of her alternates. You know, how staff partly identified mine?

Or something else could happen. Something better than that.

So you equate a post on an open forum where you were lying to a private phone call?

I'm still not sure if it's paranoia or an overactive imagination.

 

[Stravinsk]

So you equate a post on an open forum where you were lying to a private phone call?

I'm still not sure if it's paranoia or an overactive imagination.

Do you think the persons reading these posts are stupid? You must think that. I don't think many are convinced at how you are handling yourself on this topic. I bring up context, you keep leaving it out in summary dismissals.

To the question of equating the scenario to a phone call - yes, that's exactly what I did when I wrote that out. Anyone who got a communication like I described in the phone call scenario would feel a threat to their person. What is different? The communication is on a web board instead, in type, instead of voice. The "caller" or mystery account is not known initially to the person who is being asked. That being their first question and directed to a specific person (and again, I'll remind the readers that I had already answered my own question in the thread), is significant. That they had no other interests but how the men of the board wanted to die in their subsequent threads is significant.

Are you really trying to tell us, Hammster, that in the scenario described, if it was you, you'd shrug it off as nothing? A caller's (or new account's) first words (or post) are directed to you, asking how you'd like to die. Then the caller (or poster) starts 2 new threads (statements) with the same theme, now directed to men in the house (or message board) instead of just to you as originally. Then they hang up the phone (are banned).

 

[Hammster]

Do you think the persons reading these posts are stupid? You must think that. I don't think many are convinced at how you are handling yourself on this topic. I bring up context, you keep leaving it out in summary dismissals.

To the question of equating the scenario to a phone call - yes, that's exactly what I did when I wrote that out. Anyone who got a communication like I described in the phone call scenario would feel a threat to their person. What is different? The communication is on a web board instead, in type, instead of voice. The "caller" or mystery account is not known initially to the person who is being asked. That being their first question and directed to a specific person (and again, I'll remind the readers that I had already answered my own question in the thread), is significant. That they had no other interests but how the men of the board wanted to die in their subsequent threads is significant.

Are you really trying to tell us, Hammster, that in the scenario described, if it was you, you'd shrug it off as nothing? A caller's (or new account's) first words (or post) are directed to you, asking how you'd like to die. Then the caller (or poster) starts 2 new threads (statements) with the same theme, now directed to men in the house (or message board) instead of just to you as originally. Then they hang up the phone (are banned).

If that was a new member's first post to me, I'd know it was a troll and ban him or report him. There's a troll at CF who has been banned over 600 times. Fifty or more were plays on my screen name. There were threats (not veiled) to contact employers and pastors. So your little trifle is bush league, son.

Oh, and I didn't freak out like a little girl. It's time for you to man up.

 

[Stravinsk]

If that was a new member's first post to me, I'd know it was a troll and ban him or report him. There's a troll at CF who has been banned over 600 times. Fifty or more were plays on my screen name. There were threats (not veiled) to contact employers and pastors. So your little trifle is bush league, son.

Oh, and I didn't freak out like a little girl. It's time for you to man up.

Interesting.

I'm sorry this has happened to you. However, a real or psychological threat to my life is not a trifle, and I am not in fear of my life from this person. I feared what I might do myself, because of it. That's past tense, because I have forgiven her. But perhaps she should step down for her own sake, because that kind of nastiness cannot be good for the overall mental health of individuals on the board nor for the theme of the website.

 

[Hammster]

Interesting.

I'm sorry this has happened to you. However, a real or psychological threat to my life is not a trifle, and I am not in fear of my life from this person. I feared what I might do myself, because of it. That's past tense, because I have forgiven her. But perhaps she should step down for her own sake, because that kind of nastiness cannot be good for the overall mental health of individuals on the board nor for the theme of the website.

It's a trifle for men.