Welcome to Christianity Haven, thank you for visiting! If you have not already, we invite you to create an account and join in on the many discussions we have!
Please be aware that when registering you must not register while using a VPN. Any registrations made using a VPN will be rejected.
Additionally, registration emails are not being sent out which is an issue that is being worked on. Your registration may go into an approval queue for admin approval. We work to send manual emails to the email on file, so please ensure the email you use is one you can readily access!
I trust my understanding to God's revelation, for that is the only way to know ultimate truth that is needful for us, not being available though science. And Jesus is indeed the "I AM" that God claimed he himself is, which is apparent from a number of Bible passages. We should submit ourselves...
I think it would be dense to think I meant I had manuscript evidence when I was not talking about that. It is not the same as having no evidence, I value what I see in the Bible, which I have from what is passed to it from manuscripts, and it is still the word of God to me.
The name appeared...
The heaviness in the place of the same gravity does not change, there is the same attraction working on us downward when we would be submersed underwater. We both understand displacement, the same volume of water where we would be submersed is heavier, having more mass, and that will displace...
Wrong. You could only be right saying I have no new testament manuscript support. I do have Bible passage support.
Wrong. There is no such evidence shown.
You are wrong.
It is irrelevant.
These are things I think. I can think as I may, no one should argue with me about whether I have...
So you do say, but it is seemingly rather arbitrary. Why believe anything over anything else? What is there with more support or evidence to endorse, or believe in, in place of what you say you don't?
And why do I need anything to explain gravity? Gravity is explaining enough of other things...
What is your problem, about me saying what I think, you go on about not having evidence, shouting that? Why care about what I think, as if you don't think anything without evidence? And the only evidence to you is manuscript evidence? I believe things which are said in the Bible, I don't need...
I copied, edited, and paste these things. Such points can be found by any looking to any sites relating to this topic.
The belief that the Earth is flat has been described as the ultimate conspiracy theory. According to the Flat Earth Society's leadership, its ranks have grown by 200 people...
One thing I really do not get is the position there is no gravity and no upward acceleration, for accounting for the observable acceleration of any falling objects, manifest in any physics class in any school for any students, always 9.8 m/sec/sec.
"Flat-Earthers seem to have a very low...
Old testament passages are quoted in the new testament of the Bible. Your position dismisses any authority of God in the old testament, something not done in the new testament of the Bible, which abundantly supports authority of the old testament with referring to it. Old testament passages with...
A book missing is not the same thing. People are saved even where a Bible has not been seen. The gospel is the essential thing. Bibles are still desirable wherever they are not seen, for believers. But where Bibles are for believers, they should not have things missing that are important to the...
The name of God is shown in passages of the old testament, those passages are all over the place. New testament passages include quoted passages from those. Jesus spoke the name of God to his followers. You have no answer to any of the points made. There could have been removal of the name in...
To hold to what you claim, I see it would involve ignoring or dismissing God saying God's name was to be remembered always in all generations, WHEN God revealed the name, and also dismissing that Jesus made the name of God known to his followers, John 17:6, and that Jesus did not submit to and...
Meat consumption is not necessary for humans to stay healthy, but it’s also potentially quite harmful. Consider meat’s links to heart disease, diabetes and certain cancers. Or the millions of people who fall sick from listeria, E. coli, and salmonella each year due to the consumption of...
There is zero Greek new testament manuscript evidence that would support you claiming it was not eliminated, which if was not ever there, there is no reason to trust the old testament of the Bible, where it is in the passages quoted. That would undermine all the Bible, for from the beginning the...
"I'm a Meatatarian as are all proper Lutherans."
That is just not true. Certainly any and all Lutherans, like any actual Christians, can give up meat, for one day in a week, or just a series of days in a year, as if not choosing to give it up from now on. And there certainly would be a whole...
That is just not true. Certainly any and all Lutherans, like any actual Christians, can give up meat, for one day in a week, or just a series of days in a year, if not choosing to give it up from now on. And there certainly would be a whole lot of reason...
Sure there is N.T. manuscript evidence of changes. Change and addition is found in Mark 16:9-20, John 7:53-8:11, Luke 22:17-21, Luke 22:42-43, and 1 John 5:7-8.
The new testament of the Bible is known to have gone through changes to it. The evidence is good that essential things we need we still have intact in it. The best we can have is comparative studies. And where old testament passages of the Bible are repeated in the new testament of the Bible, we...
I am glad to hear you really do go and observe these things yourself. I do too.
I mean that if you use social media with many contacts from many places even far away, with chat available, it can be checked that while you see that the sun is up, in another place in the world the sun is down and...