Search results

I use scripture with those who can understand it. Logic and history with those who can't. I provided Luther's take on it and you reject Him too. So why argue? Jesus tells us to avoid the reckless handling of his treasures.

You are not seeing all the verses that limit the atonement. So we cannot discuss it. Why would Luther teach it if scripture didn't mention it?

Even as a child, I never believed in Santa Claus. And discouraged my little one from believing in him. It would redefine believing in Jesus as another hoax.

Fair enough.

Christian Discussion - No Debate Archive Read Only. Let's follow the rules. I post on a take-it-or-leave-it policy.

Why did they kill Cranmer? Was he right about the Papacy and the 39 Articles?

You seem to be at a loss for words, unable to defend your view.

I would like to see some scripture from you instead of your venting in picture form. It seems you have nothing. Or you would be setting me straight.

The Jews are a false religion based on the hatred of Christ. They are not a Race. In fact, they are not even Semites, but Jewish converts of the 9th century from near Turkey called the Khazars. Luther was against false religion, not people.

I don't think Unitarians understand the bible based on those I've exposed in other forums.

Archbishop Cranmer had established the identity of the antichrist with the Pope and made it a fundamental point of Anglican doctrine. For instance, the “Exhortation to Obedience” that appears in the First Book of Homilies compiled by Cranmer for publication in 1547 (his successor, Matthew Parker...

Why do you prefer Biden?

I'm glad to see you posting something other than sour pusses in replying to my hours of research. If you can prove it wrong do so. I would appreciate knowing of my errors.

My post begins with the Papacy. And his actions prove he is the Antichrist. The Anglican Cranmer preached it until they killed him along with many others. Why would they kill so many? Any ideas?

What part did the Anglicans play in the Reformation? Didn't they waffle back and forth? Didn't your church fund the Westminster Confession?

It proves you are wrong.

The Antichrist Pope begins my article. Try reading it to see what it says before condemning it.

Archbishop Cranmer had established the identity of the antichrist with the Pope and made it a fundamental point of Anglican doctrine. For instance, the “Exhortation to Obedience” that appears in the First Book of Homilies compiled by Cranmer for publication in 1547 (his successor, Matthew Parker...

Creeds naming the papacy as the Antichrist; The first written history suggests Arnulf, the archbishop of Reims in the 10th century identified the Papacy as the Antichrist. Later Joachim of Fiore in the 12th century preached the Papacy was the Antichrist. This led to the martyrdom of many...

You miss it altogether and wind up with free will and Pelagianism instead.