Search results

Michael does not believe in the tri-Unity of God.

Falcons

Coffee

Josiah, You’re going off the deep end, using process of elimination rather then deal with the text!

Acts 16 states that they believed along with the whole household After they believed they were baptized along with the whole household It doesn’t indicate whether there were children. Perhaps there were and they heard the good news, believed, and were baptized

None of the verses of Scripture shows infants being baptized. They are symbolic and refer to believers’ baptism.

We dealt with this already.

He never said His return was at hand, did he? Nope He didn’t. The gospel went out to the Jews first; that is what Jesus commanded the 120 disciples He told the 11 to go into the whole world not just to Israel Matthew 24 is depicting another period, when the Son of Man would return in glory...

Perhaps Jesus Quoted the Septuagint and not the Masoretic Text.

What does infant baptism produce? Don’t say grace because that’s a gift from God.

Hi Doug That’s a good question. To answer it properly, we need to read what Jesus said about the time of His coming. Matthew 24 gives us a lot of detail as to what will occur before Jesus returns. In John 16 Jesus was referring to the 72 disciples In Matthew 24 He is referring to those...

The Book of Acts shows multiple times that after a person believed that person was then baptized. Baptism did not save the person. Faith did.

Read my post out of context!! If you’re going to quote me quote me in toto! I said it is God’s will that all come to repentance and a knowledge of the truth!! I noticed that AT Pollard quoted Scripture and all you did was give opinion!!

The account in Acts includes the sons of Joseph, where Exodus 1;5 mentions only the sons of Jacob. That might explain the discrepancy.

It is God’s will that all come to repentance and a knowledge of the truth Nowhere does God say it is His will that infants be baptized.

What is the value in infant baptism?

I would say all Apocryphal writings, not just a few. Who determines what is and is not inspired?

The question should be “were the writings of the Apocrypha inspired or not? If so how can we know? If not how can we know?

You’re quoting from Luke; try quoting from Acts where Jesus has already been crucified, buried, and resurrected! Peter did preach that gospel

Doug, Looks as if you are talking the Scriptures out of context to make your own pretext. Read it all in context and you cannot say Peter and Paul preached two different gospel messages. They both preached the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.