Search results

Ok then. So you don't think the author of Hebrews was talking about Maccabees, even though the best of the best Bible scholars in all of England were convinced he was. Wow. You're wiser in your own eyes than all of them. Then tell me, big shot. What is the author talking about? Who were these...

Doesn't Hebrews 11:35 make it sound like Paul considered Maccabees to be scripture?

Why wouldn't God's Word matter to you? Why are you even asking that question?

What you need to understand is that there was a Jewish conspiracy to corrupt scripture. And you're being duped by that conspiracy. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Then why did Church fathers believe they were? Even Church fathers like Athanasius, who specifically said he rejects the Apocrypha, didn't even list Maccabees as Apocrypha. Origen also rejected the Apocrypha. But Origen quotes Maccabees and calls it holy scripture. Sent from my iPhone using...

Not sure what you mean by that, man. Jesus doesn't barely ever talk about chickens, except when he told Peter about the rooster crowing. That's it. Usually he talks about lambs. Nowhere anywhere in the Old Testament do we find this phrase. But we find it in 2 Esdras, and in Matthew 23. And how...

Gutenberg invented the printing press in the 1400's, a century before the Geneva Bible. So yes, they had the technology to include marginal notes. As I said, it's a replica of the 1560 Geneva Bible. And that wasn't the first English Bible. And again, I nor anyone here EVER claimed that the...

I still don't understand what you're saying. Who ever claimed that the Geneva Bible was taken from the KJV? I don't remember anyone here or anyone in the video ever claiming that. ???? You seem to be trying to disprove a claim that nobody ever made. The original 1560 Geneva Bible is as exactly...

What's your point? The Geneva Bible included the Apocrypha, so....I don't get what you're saying. What? Just because the video quotes the KJV Apocrypha? Didn't the guy in the video specifically say that he's only doing that because it's easier to read? I really don't understand your point...

So you admit that your goal is not to lie to people. If so, then why did you lie and say that 1 Esdras puts Artaxerxes before Cyrus? I read it. Chapter 2 starts off taking about how Cyrus issued the command to start building the temple, and then later on Artaxerxes comes along and brings it to...

And? I'm not sure what your point is. You're saying that the Geneva Bible is not the same Bible as the King James Bible. Yea. What's your point? Why would anyone suggest that they're the same Bible? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where do you get off saying that 1 Esdras incorrectly puts Artaxerxes before Cyrus? I've read it, and it correctly puts Cryus before Artaxerxes. Do you really think that it's a good idea to lie to people?

Anybody ever studied Psalm 145? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I got invited to the group recently. Some of you may know some of my YouTube videos. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have the Geneva Bible. It has a table of contents and marginal notes. What makes you think it doesn't? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have the 1560 Geneva Bible. It's an exact, page by page replica of the original. And yes, it has marginal notes, a table of contents, and the Apocryphal section. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk