Search results

Co-Redemtrix is not a doctrine of the Catholic Church. Some Catholics would like to se it proclaimed a dogma but the Church has done so.

Erroneous from start to finish. But then you provide no evidence for your opinions.

Since Orthodox split of from the Catholic Church how can they be older?

Catholicism IS mainstream Christian Theology since Catholics are 50% of the world's Christians

You claimed it was placed on the index because it did not have an imprimatur. That is was placed on the index was because, as I quoted,it was "deemed heretical or contrary to morality by the Sacred Congregation of the Index" not because it did not have an imprimatur. I believe what the Church...

That's ridiculous. There are millions of books in the world that do not have an imprimatur. They were never on the Index. Note the the full title: "Index Librorum Prohibitorum (English: Index of Forbidden Books) was a changing list of publications deemed heretical or contrary to morality by the...

That the Index has been abolished does not suddenly mean that those books condemned by it are suddenly OK. You condemn the EWTN article a opinion and then give an opinion by Fr. Mitch Pacwa !!!!! As the article said "Her multi-volume work, The Poem of the Man-God , has been discredited by the...

Having looked up her books I don't see an Imprimatur or a Nihil obstat - not surprising if they have been condemned by the Vatican. This also debunks her- the messages of Maria Valtorta and her Poem of the Man-God: True or False?

According to Catholic Answers, Maria Valtorta "has shown herself to be an unreliable author on Catholic matters. Her multi-volume work, The Poem of the Man-God , has been discredited by the Holy See on more than one occasion..." Steer Clear of Maria Valtorta's "The Book of Azariah" And from...

https://catholicherald.co.uk/drag-queen-confirms-it-was-a-parody-of-last-supper/

Lk 22:29-30 says: "29 and I assign to you, as my Father assigned to me, a kingdom, 30 that you may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel." Jesus refers to my kingdom that the Father assigned to him, so it must be separate from Jesus himself.

I agree. Sometimes a doctrine requires more explanation to help it being more fully understood. But that does not change the doctrine. Take your example of the Immaculate Conception. In the Compendium to the Catechism (CCCC) there is one paragraph (96) on this. But it refers to the full...

In that case I suggest you practice what you preach.

More straw men, obfuscations and falsehoods. BTW my name is Stephen not stephan and for the umpteenth time the topic is DOCTRINE not TEACHING. And still not a single example of defined doctrine being changed.

Looking back though your recent posts I see lots of opinions and claims with only one fact (a quote from Vatican 1)

That is just one great big straw man argument.

No, just claims No you didn't.

A claim you make with no evidence. Also for something to change it must exist. If it did not exist before it was created then it cannot be said to have changed.

As I pointed out before: Depends what you mean by change. Take the example of Vincent Lerins that I gave. The limb (eg. foot) of a child is the same foot as when he/she becomes an adult. There is no change of form in that development. Yes, there is a change in size but that is not the essence...

The title of this thread is The development of DOCTRINE.