Search results

  1. S

    Prayer practises.

    So, according to you it is OK for someone to ask you to pray to God for them, and you will do it. But it's not OK for you to ask someone else to pray to God for you. You don't see an error with that? Assuming you are referring to your post #7 then my reply is in post #8. And we are back to...
  2. S

    Prayer practises.

    But as I pointed, out we know they heat our prayers. We know that those in heaven are aware of what is happening on earth. Lk 15:7 & 10 Rev 6:10 We also know that (at least) some of those in heaven are presenting out prayers before the throne. Rev 5:8 & 8:3 Tobit 12:12 Paul asked people to...
  3. S

    Prayer practises.

    No they are not God. They are not omniscient. If they hear our prayers it is because it is God’s will that they do and He will make it possible. God makes things known to people as he wills and makes possible. Now there was a disciple at Damascus named Ananias. The Lord said to him in a...
  4. S

    Mariology

    This is nonsense More nonsense. All this garbage ultimately goes back to that charlatan Alexander Hislop and his piece of fiction - The Two Babylons. If I get time, and I'm a bit short of time at the moment, I'll start a thread on Mary, Queen of Heaven with Biblical support for that title.
  5. S

    Mark 13:10

    You keep ignoring what I write or distort it. You cannot supply evidence that Nicodemus wrote a gospel. You cannot supply evidence that Nicodemus was a follower of Jesus. I'm wasting no more time on this.
  6. S

    Mark 13:10

    Not true. They knew Jesus came from Galilee A requirement for what? The point is that they reckon no prophet ever came out of Galilee. They didn't ask for a thorough investigation. They just asked Nicodemus if a prophet ever came out of Galilee (implication that Jesus could not be a prophet)...
  7. S

    Mark 13:10

    Just because John mentions some (not all) of them in various places it does not mean they were one of the twelve apostles. Nowhere does John give a list of the twelve. In your opinion You cannot prove it therefore it's your opinion; not a fact. Not trolling. Just pointing out that your have...
  8. S

    Mark 13:10

    If you read the gospels you will find that following Jesus is an action - leaving your job and literally following Jesus around Israel. For example Luke 5:11 "And when they had brought their boats to land, they [Simon, James and John] left everything and followed him". There is no evidence that...
  9. S

    Mark 13:10

    John didn't list the twelve apostles Why not?er 3 In your opinion No he wasn't He wasn't one of the twelve The historical evidence shows that Luke wrote "The gospel according to Luke". Your results are full of opinions and speculation. You offer no proof.
  10. S

    Mark 13:10

    No, not too difficult to handle. I just needed to know which post you were referring to. My comments on it will, be in my next post Nicodemus came to Jesus at night. He didn’t follow Jesus. John's gospel doesn't say Nicodemus was challenged to investigate Jesus. In your opinion You...
  11. S

    Mark 13:10

    Still dodging. Still no evidence that Nicodemus was a follower of Jesus. Still no evidence that Nicodemus wrote a gospel More insults. Point me to this analysis to "points me away from Matthew to Nicodemus. By point I mean the exact post number - not more vague look in the thread. You call...
  12. S

    Mark 13:10

    No need to descend to insults. They don't help your points. Of course I can find information about Nicodemus in the Bible but none of it says that Nicodemus was a follower of Jesus or that he wrote a gospel. I'm still waiting for your evidence that: 1. Nicodemus wrote the gospel according to...
  13. S

    Mark 13:10

    I gave you biblical and historical evidence that Matthew was a follower of Jesus and that he wrote a gospel. You have given me no evidence that Nicodemus was a follower of Jesus or that he wrote a gospel. What you wrote was an failure because it does not address the issue of whether Nicodemus...
  14. S

    Mark 13:10

    Yes it is evidence. We could ague about the quality of the evidence but it is evidence. More ad-hominens to try and disguise your failure to provide evidence. I expect you to provide evidence not a process for working anything out. The fact is there is no evidence for your claims otherwise...
  15. S

    Mark 13:10

    No, I just want you to present the evidence; something you seem very reluctant to do. I've given it to you
  16. S

    Mark 13:10

    You have given no evidence that Nicodemus wrote the gospel according to Matthew. Nil. Zero You have given no evidence that Nicodemus was a follower of Jesus. Nil. Zero You keep avoiding these issues.
  17. S

    Mark 13:10

    That really is crazy. There is no evidence that James wrote the gospel according to Mark
  18. S

    Mark 13:10

    Is John the only gospel you believe is valid? A claim you have provided no evidence for. Your assertion are not enough.
  19. S

    Mark 13:10

    As I keep saying: You have given no evidence that Nicodemus wrote a gospel - you just assert it. You have given no evidence that Nicodemus was a follower of Jesus. This is nothing to do with Matthew 16
  20. S

    Mark 13:10

    Still no evidence for your claims, just personal abuse.
Top Bottom