I'm not splintering the topic at all.
now im giving you an example of dissecting a post so much it becomes buried in meaningless ambiguity of many points and many words all blurring out the straight forward truth of a matter .
which can amount to a form of lying .. asking questions which flod the heart with doubt and uncertaintly -ie .. Did god
reeeally say ...?
How does it make any sense to claim that visiting a human doctor is showing a lack of faith
are there other kinds of doctors other then human ?
How does it make any sense to claim that visiting a human doctor is showing a lack of faith in God to heal us, and then insist that going to work doesn't represent an equal lack of faith in God to provide for us?
- did anyone actually say outright that going to a doctor shows a lack of faith in God i recall i said it displays whom we have the most faith in ..as it depends upon whom we call on ..man or god to save us .
are you saying that having faith in God above all else is absurd ? thats absurd
Do you have a specific counter to the points being raised against the "healing free-for-all" approach,
do we need to counter the word of God who promises answer to all who ask him "believing "?
I'm not justifying carnal reasoning at all.
sounds like you are .
Didn't Paul call us to "test all things"?
in what context ,, ? if we test the lords word to see if he is faithful and true to it .. we will be healed -is he Not faithful and true to His word ?
How can we test without undertaking some form of reasoning? Do you remember why Paul lauded the Bereans? It was for studying the Scriptures to test his teaching, not just blindly "having faith" in the new guy with a new message, not for deciding whether his teachings sounded good or "resonated with his spirit" (whatever that means), not for dismissing people who weren't sure with comments about their lack of faith or trying to justify carnal reasoning.
if we have simply read the words .. and then we beleive ..how is that faith "blind " ..is there another kind of faith your on about ?
Since you seem to dislike what you call "carnal reasoning", how would you go about following the Scriptural call to "test all things", "test the spirits", and "take heed that you not be deceived"?
are you saying that if we read the words of the bible as inspired by the holy Spirit and believe them.. that we are being deceived in doing so .. but if we trust in mans words over Gods words we do well? ? ?
-this has been an example in over dissecting a post
the truth is the lord JEsus said .. what ever you ask in my name according to my will i will do it - so the questions is not ..is he wrong .. but where are we wrong if it seems we do not get what we ask for ? James says it is because we ask amiss .. he also says if we ask wavering in unbelief that we must not think we will receive anything .. and so we don't .