Post #3 on Page 1 (Pedrito):
“For Pedrito, Lent has never lent any particular motivation for observance.
Perhaps that is because Pedrito has always leant towards apostolic practice, as revealed in the Holy Writings.”
Post #6 on Page 1 (MoreCoffee):
“Excellent, then you know about the forty day fast of the Lord.”
In Post #26 on Page 3 Pedrito pointed out that Jesus’ fast (and Moses’) had nothing to do with apostolic practice. Nor could it be used as a basis for Lent.
Then, Post #27 on Page 3 (MoreCoffee):
“Pedrito, one can fast without giving up all food. The point of a fast during lent is to not starve for 40 days it is to remember the privation that Jesus endured for the sake of the faithful and to endure some privation for the sake of those to whom the faithful minister in charity.”
Then why bring up “the forty day fast of the Lord” in the first place?
Especially in response to Pedrito’s reference to apostolic practice – apostolic practice in which “Lent” and “Easter” had no place.