murdering ideas

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,194
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Pushing "the party line" against "the opposition" even when not invited to do so and when the topic needs no rebuttal is one way to kill an idea. It's a sort of murder. Not a crime. Just destructive - like the republican vs democrat thing in the USA.
 

Cassia

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 13, 2016
Messages
1,735
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Marital Status
Widow/Widower
Pushing "the party line" against "the opposition" even when not invited to do so and when the topic needs no rebuttal is one way to kill an idea. It's a sort of murder. Not a crime. Just destructive - like the republican vs democrat thing in the USA.
Could you expand on this topic please. It might help clarify the discussion that is taking place in the senior member forum. Or I could be completely off as to the topic on the forum in general :confused:
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,194
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Could you expand on this topic please. It might help clarify the discussion that is taking place in the senior member forum. Or I could be completely off as to the topic on the forum in general :confused:

It's been a few months since I wrote the original post in this thread. If I try hard I may remember the context that encouraged me to write it. Let's see how I go ...

I wrote "Pushing "the party line" against "the opposition" even when not invited to do so and when the topic needs no rebuttal is one way to kill an idea. It's a sort of murder. Not a crime. Just destructive - like the republican vs democrat thing in the USA."

In politics the idea would be to push whatever the political party says is their position on a topic even if doing so will harm the nation and end any chance of productive conversation and compromise for the benefit of the people.

In religion the idea would be to push whatever the denomination says is their position on a topic even if doing so will harm Christianity and end any chance of productive conversation and ecumenical work for the benefit of the people.

In CH the idea would be to push whatever the denomination (or at least one's understanding of what the denomination) says is their position even if doing so will frustrate your friends in CH and end any chance of productive conversation with them for the benefit of whoever reads the thread. I imagine some friendships are ended this way. Some friendships may be damaged this way. Some enmities are probably created this way.

Take it as read that people will happily taunt and annoy their enemies in CH. That is the custom on message boards.

Does that help?
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom