The Second presidential debate

[tango]

Highlander (I know him in person) might have access to links that we don't have permission to view.

Maybe, but it's still pretty useless to make an allegation and support it with nothing more than "hey, you can Google as easily as I can, go find it yourself". If that's acceptable here's an allegation - Obama is a literal demon who has a smell of sulfur about him. If you Google it you'll probably find the allegation for yourself, I read an article that suggested Obama himself referred to it and even sniffed his own arm as if to check for a sulfur smell. The person making the allegation was (I think) Alex Jones, and needless to say Mr Obama took something of a mocking tone when referring to the allegation. But if you search it's out there, so it must be true, right?

 

[tango]

Yup, not sure how people can still vote for him.. I am beginning to believe what he said about committing murder in Times Square and still people would vote for him

If Donald Trump were, well, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton were a tower of virtue you'd have a point. But given Clinton's somewhat questionable relationship with the truth over the years it's not as if it's a choice between an angel and a demon, more a choice between two candidates when neither is fit for the job.

When significant numbers of people on both sides are supporting one candidate with little more in mind than keeping the other out of office it shows just how bad things have got. Yes, Trump has said a lot of things that are way below the standard we'd reasonably expect from a presidential candidate. At the same time it's not as if Clinton has a spotless record, so don't rule out the notion of people voting for Trump because they don't want to even think about the damage four or even eight years of a Clinton presidency might cause.

 

[tango]

Still it shows his general character especially where women are concerned and the women coming forward confirms it

It's curious to think of a situation where a well known billionaire groped someone and apparently she only remembered a few weeks before a major election. It's also curious to see both sides insisting that allegations made by their side against the other side are sound, while allegations made by the other side are nothing more than mudslinging.

 

[MarkFL]

Yes, the timing of these allegations is more than a little suspicious, I will admit.

 

[MoreCoffee]

Yes, the timing of these allegations is more than a little suspicious, I will admit.

As was the timing of the Wikileaks email release. One might say that the sex-assault talk on the bus trumped the wikileak.

 

[Highlander]

Maybe, but it's still pretty useless to make an allegation and support it with nothing more than "hey, you can Google as easily as I can, go find it yourself". If that's acceptable here's an allegation - Obama is a literal demon who has a smell of sulfur about him. If you Google it you'll probably find the allegation for yourself, I read an article that suggested Obama himself referred to it and even sniffed his own arm as if to check for a sulfur smell. The person making the allegation was (I think) Alex Jones, and needless to say Mr Obama took something of a mocking tone when referring to the allegation. But if you search it's out there, so it must be true, right?

Hmmmmm, as I continue my efforts to assist your attempt to access common knowledge, I would encourage you to visit some of the major websites, such as drudgereport.com, http://www.breitbart.com/, http://www.newsmax.com/, http://www.truthrevolt.org/, http://www.oann.com/, Fox News Channel -- and even listen to Rush Limbaugh's and Sean Hannity's radio programs.

Most of these are conservative oriented -- and conservatism, by it's very nature, is bathed in truth, accuracy and the traditional values that America was founded on.

Just sample some of these places and you'll find all of the information you've been demanding proof for.

Good luck! :ewink:

 

[Rens]

Maybe, but it's still pretty useless to make an allegation and support it with nothing more than "hey, you can Google as easily as I can, go find it yourself". If that's acceptable here's an allegation - Obama is a literal demon who has a smell of sulfur about him. If you Google it you'll probably find the allegation for yourself, I read an article that suggested Obama himself referred to it and even sniffed his own arm as if to check for a sulfur smell. The person making the allegation was (I think) Alex Jones, and needless to say Mr Obama took something of a mocking tone when referring to the allegation. But if you search it's out there, so it must be true, right?

Obama once hired aliens.
When they asked him about it he said: they were too expensive, we had to fire them.

 

[Rens]

I read that a model got offered a few 10 thousands to seduce Cosby. All those stories of raped women were just lies. Guess they got paid for that too.

 

[MarkFL]

 

[MoreCoffee]

Hmmmmm, as I continue my efforts to assist your attempt to access common knowledge, I would encourage you to visit some of the major websites, such as drudgereport.com, http://www.breitbart.com/, http://www.newsmax.com/, http://www.truthrevolt.org/, http://www.oann.com/, Fox News Channel -- and even listen to Rush Limbaugh's and Sean Hannity's radio programs.

Most of these are conservative oriented -- and conservatism, by it's very nature, is bathed in truth, accuracy and the traditional values that America was founded on.

Just sample some of these places and you'll find all of the information you've been demanding proof for.

Good luck! :ewink:

The sources your post contains are all right leaning or fringe right groups. They are far from sober objective sources. The credibility of the story you told is low if these are the sources from which you drew it.

Newsmax Media, commonly called Newsmax, is an American news media organization founded by Christopher Ruddy and based in West Palm Beach, Florida. It operates a multiplatform network focused on conservative-leaning[1] media, including the news website Newsmax.com, publishes the Franklin Prosperity Report and Newsmax magazine, and the cable news channel Newsmax TV.

Breitbart News Network (known simply as Breitbart News, Breitbart or Breitbart.com) is a politically conservative[4][5][6] American news and opinion website founded in 2007 by conservative commentator and entrepreneur Andrew Breitbart (1969–2012). It also has a daily radio program, Breitbart News Daily.

Breitbart is headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with bureaus in Texas, London, and Jerusalem. Stephen Bannon serves as the publication's executive chairman, with Alexander Marlow serving as the editor-in-chief.[4]

The New York Times describes Breitbart News as a "curiosity of the fringe right wing", with "ideologically driven journalists", that is a source of controversy "over material that has been called misogynist, xenophobic and racist", and is now a "potent voice" for Donald J. Trump's presidential campaign.[7] Notable events in Breitbart's history have included the ACORN 2009 undercover videos controversy, the firing of Shirley Sherrod, the Anthony Weiner sexting scandals, the "Friends of Hamas" story, the Nancy Pelosi/Miley Cyrus ad campaign, the misidentification of Loretta Lynch, and Michelle Fields' allegations against Corey Lewandowski. [8]

TruthRevolt is a conservative U.S. news and activism website. Founded in 2013 by Ben Shapiro and David Horowitz as a counterpoint to the politically progressive Media Matters for America, it is a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.[2] The site's stated mission is "to expose the leftist news media and to hold them accountable for their hypocrisy and bias."[3]

One America News Network (abbreviated as OANN, commonly referred to as One America News (abbreviated as OAN)) is an American cable news television channel that is owned by Herring Networks, Inc.. The network is headquartered in San Diego, California, and operates a news bureau in Washington, D.C.[1]

OANN is a conservative- news network,[2] OAN's stated focus is delivering a credible source of national and international news 24/7.[3] OAN features news programming and political talk shows, along with network special documentary-style reports. Its news coverage attempts to maintain objectivity while its political talk shows illustrate a strong conservative view.[4]

The channel was launched on July 4, 2013. One America has limited national carriage on Verizon FiOS and AT&T U-verse, along with a number of regional cable providers, including CenturyLink, Consolidated Communications, and GCI.[5] As of 2015, it is available in 15 million homes.[4]​

 

[Rens]

If it's just lies Clinton should say so. Trump adviced Cosby to do that.
If someone doesn't get outraged about such false accusations you think it's true. Of course Clinton had that thing with Monica Lewinsky, who seduced him, so it's to me improbable that he would rape someone, but it could be true. With Cosby I was like: no way, that's impossible.
We'd better just pray for all those people.

 

[Rens]

Most of these are conservative oriented -- and conservatism, by it's very nature, is bathed in truth, accuracy and the traditional values that America was founded on.

Just sample some of these places and you'll find all of the information you've been demanding proof for.

Good luck! :ewink:

Lol I thought that was sarcasm, but I guess not.

 

[Rens]

That woman was married at the time. Why didn't her husband go to the police if it's true?

 

[MoreCoffee]

If it's just lies Clinton should say so. Trump adviced Cosby to do that.
If someone doesn't get outraged about such false accusations you think it's true. Of course Clinton had that thing with Monica Lewinsky, who seduced him, so it's to me improbable that he would rape someone, but it could be true. With Cosby I was like: no way, that's impossible.
We'd better just pray for all those people.

Bill Clinton is not running for the presidency. Hillary Clinton is. The attempts made by the Donald Trump presidential campaign organisation to damage Hillary Clinton by making unproven accusations about Bill Clinton ought to be dismissed as muck raking against the Candidate's husband because there's nothing substantial to say against the candidate, Hillary Clinton.

 

[Highlander]

Lol I thought that was sarcasm, but I guess not.

Sarcasm? Your reply, in itself, IS sarcasm. A pity with all that is at stake.

 

[Rens]

Lol I just saw on Facebook that a girl had shown that movie where they're singing Time of my life to her 91 year old grandparents and they thought it was for real. Grandma, it's fake. No I saw them singing myself with the News. Isn't that wonderful? Hillary has such a great voice.

 

[Rens]

Sarcasm? Your reply, in itself, IS sarcasm. A pity with all that is at stake.

A lot of times my replies are sarcasm, but now I really thought it was meant sarcastic.

http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/...dit-mainstream-outlets-paved-way-trump/212422

 

[Josiah]

Bill Clinton is not running for the presidency. Hillary Clinton is. The attempts made by the Donald Trump presidential campaign organisation to damage Hillary Clinton by making unproven accusations about Bill Clinton ought to be dismissed as muck raking against the Candidate's husband because there's nothing substantial to say against the candidate, Hillary Clinton.

Hillary supported her husband..... Hillary suggested women who accuse powerful (good) men of such things are not credible..... Hillary threw the accusers under the bus. TRUE, she didn't have affairs with others but she did say a lot about accusations made to her husband. So, IMO, what her husband did and what Hillary did and said in reply IS relevant.

IMO, it's likely Bill and Donald are both pigs. Of course, Romney was the poster boy for morality and ethics and NO BODY CARED. And "Evangelicals" who so protested Bill seem quite in love with Trump. Go figure. Nothing in this election makes sense.