I dont come across a lot of people who go around healing the sick ,that then speak in the negative about God healing..
You're mixing up arguments here.
I've prayed for people and seen them healed. I've seen someone go from so critically ill in ICU that their family was called, to walking out of the ward under their own steam and unaided within a couple of days, following prayer. I still don't believe God heals everybody. Why? Because sometimes I pray for people to be healed and they are, and sometimes I pray for people to be healed and they are not.
ask a those here who are implying God doessnt heal all christians.."do you lay hands on and heal the sick? Not once back in 1989..but as a regular day to day living out of the gospel.
Yet another logical fallacy. If God doesn't heal one single person that is all it takes to prove that "God heals all" is false. It only takes one. Have you ever, in your entire life, prayed for someone to be healed and see them not healed? If so, your own experience bears testimony to the fact that God does not heal everybody. You can't even pull the faith card because if you have the faith to see one healed why do you suddenly not have the faith to see another healed?
So its not unreasonable to say those that dont do it are those who also speak from an unbelieving stance about it.
Stop trying to attack me with accusations.
It's totally unreasonable to make that statement, it's based on nothing more than an assumption. You don't see people doing it, therefore it doesn't happen. You're also still falling into the trap of thinking the options are "God always heals" or "God doesn't heal". "God sometimes heals" fills the gap quite nicely.
i say Jesus is the same yesterday today and forever..its what he said.
i say if you believe. all things ate possible...its what Jesus said.
i say ..by his stripes you were healed..
i agree with God.
His word is not a false premise.
You say all sorts of things that aren't relevant to the discussion, and still fall back on your assumption that Is 53:5 means what you want it to mean, still ignoring Scripture that appears to conflict with it. Endlessly repeating the mantra doesn't make it true.
You could pull Luke 19:30-31 out and use it to claim that it's OK to steal horses. After all, Jesus told his disciples to go and take a colt that didn't belong to them with no justification beyond "our master needs it". But however many times you repeated it, you're still not OK if you go round taking horses. It's a classic example of a passage that's descriptive rather than a clear pattern that we're expected to follow.